Everyday Executive Functioning in Paediatric Patients Awaiting Solid Organ or Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction Paediatric patients with severe diseases awaiting solid organ or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are known to experience cognitive impairments, particularly in executive functioning. Neuropsychological pre-transplant evaluation serves as a baseline for identifying executive functioning deficits that may affect the medical and psychosocial aspects of care. This is clinically relevant because patients with poorer executive functioning may show decreased adherence to medical treatments, face greater challenges in coping with their illness, and be more likely to require educational adaptations, including curricular or methodological adjustments based on pedagogical criteria. Objectives This study aimed to assess everyday executive functioning in paediatric patients awaiting transplantation using an ecologically valid measure. Methods A total of 49 patients (59.2% male) aged between 6 and 18 years ( M = 11.4, S.D. = 3.5) were recruited from La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Patients were awaiting for various types of organ transplants (kidney: 26, heart: 4, lung: 4, hepato-renal: 3, or liver: 2 patients) or haematopoietic stem cells (10 patients). Patients were assessed using the Spanish parent-reported version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) with age- and sex-adjusted norms from the Spanish general population. The three BRIEF-2 composite scores were analysed (the Cognitive, Emotional and Behavioral Regulation Indexes), and clinically relevant scores were set at T ≥ 65 points. Results Clinically significant levels of executive deficits were observed in 33.3% of patients regarding cognitive regulation problems, in 32.7% regarding emotional regulation difficulties and in 26.5% regarding behavioural regulation problems. Conclusions Between 1 in 4 and 1 in 3 patients have shown some type of executive regulation difficulties. The early identification of executive functioning deficits in paediatric transplant candidates is crucial. Incorporating standardised ecologically valid measures, such as the BRIEF-2, into routine assessments can help detect neuropsychological impairments at an early stage, allowing timely therapeutic or preventive interventions (e.g., psychological prehabilitation). This approach can improve medical outcomes and quality of life and guide educational adaptations to support academic performance. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.1687
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Everyday Executive Functioning in Paediatric Patients Awaiting Solid Organ or Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

M. F. Bravo-Ortiz, Antonio Pérez‐Martínez, E. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío de la Vega et al.
European Psychiatry
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Everyday Executive Functioning in Paediatric Patients Awaiting Solid Organ or Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

M. F. Bravo-Ortiz, Antonio Pérez‐Martínez, E. Fernández-Jiménez, Rocío de la Vega, Jessica Garrido-Bolton
article en

Abstract

Introduction Paediatric patients with severe diseases awaiting solid organ or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are known to experience cognitive impairments, particularly in executive functioning. Neuropsychological pre-transplant evaluation serves as a baseline for identifying executive functioning deficits that may affect the medical and psychosocial aspects of care. This is clinically relevant because patients with poorer executive functioning may show decreased adherence to medical treatments, face greater challenges in coping with their illness, and be more likely to require educational adaptations, including curricular or methodological adjustments based on pedagogical criteria. Objectives This study aimed to assess everyday executive functioning in paediatric patients awaiting transplantation using an ecologically valid measure. Methods A total of 49 patients (59.2% male) aged between 6 and 18 years ( M = 11.4, S.D. = 3.5) were recruited from La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Patients were awaiting for various types of organ transplants (kidney: 26, heart: 4, lung: 4, hepato-renal: 3, or liver: 2 patients) or haematopoietic stem cells (10 patients). Patients were assessed using the Spanish parent-reported version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF-2) with age- and sex-adjusted norms from the Spanish general population. The three BRIEF-2 composite scores were analysed (the Cognitive, Emotional and Behavioral Regulation Indexes), and clinically relevant scores were set at T ≥ 65 points. Results Clinically significant levels of executive deficits were observed in 33.3% of patients regarding cognitive regulation problems, in 32.7% regarding emotional regulation difficulties and in 26.5% regarding behavioural regulation problems. Conclusions Between 1 in 4 and 1 in 3 patients have shown some type of executive regulation difficulties. The early identification of executive functioning deficits in paediatric transplant candidates is crucial. Incorporating standardised ecologically valid measures, such as the BRIEF-2, into routine assessments can help detect neuropsychological impairments at an early stage, allowing timely therapeutic or preventive interventions (e.g., psychological prehabilitation). This approach can improve medical outcomes and quality of life and guide educational adaptations to support academic performance. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.