Personal recovery in psychosis: neurobiological basis

Introduction Personal recovery in psychosis is one of the fields where research and clinical activities are growing faster. But the concept lacks conceptual clarity and internal consistency. As a result, most of the studies evaluating its efectiveness may be biased. As in any other intervention, great improvement in clinical evolution of the users has been claimed. And so, neurobiological changes should be described. Objectives This study finds to develop a systematic review of studies describing changes surrounding the recovery process from a neurobiological level. Methods Keywords hev been selected in order to find all studies focussing on personal recovery in psychosis from its neurobiological basis. Qualitative studies of personal recovery will be excluded. Cross-sectional, longitudinal as well as intervention studies will be included. Results The systematic review is underway. The study protocol will be registered at PROSPERO database. Conclusions Most studies researching about personal recovery have been developed taking “personal recovery” as an outcome marker. But this is not enough. We need to clarify the neurobiological basis underlying this concept. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2172
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal recovery in psychosis: neurobiological basis

Melissa A. Cortina, Juan José Martínez Jambrina, N. Á. Alvargonzález, L. P. Gómez
European Psychiatry
Psychology of Development and Education
article

Personal recovery in psychosis: neurobiological basis

Melissa A. Cortina, Juan José Martínez Jambrina, N. Á. Alvargonzález, L. P. Gómez
article en

Abstract

Introduction Personal recovery in psychosis is one of the fields where research and clinical activities are growing faster. But the concept lacks conceptual clarity and internal consistency. As a result, most of the studies evaluating its efectiveness may be biased. As in any other intervention, great improvement in clinical evolution of the users has been claimed. And so, neurobiological changes should be described. Objectives This study finds to develop a systematic review of studies describing changes surrounding the recovery process from a neurobiological level. Methods Keywords hev been selected in order to find all studies focussing on personal recovery in psychosis from its neurobiological basis. Qualitative studies of personal recovery will be excluded. Cross-sectional, longitudinal as well as intervention studies will be included. Results The systematic review is underway. The study protocol will be registered at PROSPERO database. Conclusions Most studies researching about personal recovery have been developed taking “personal recovery” as an outcome marker. But this is not enough. We need to clarify the neurobiological basis underlying this concept. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Hospital Universitario San Agustín (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.