Metaheuristic-Based PID Controller Design with MOOD Decision Support Applied to Benchmark Industrial Systems

This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for the multiobjective tuning of MIMO proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers using advanced metaheuristic strategies. The proposed approach formulates a cost function based on two conflicting performance criteria—the integral of absolute error (IAE) and the integral of absolute derivative of control (IADU)—to explore the trade-off between tracking performance and control effort systematically. Three metaheuristic techniques are employed: stochastic hill climbing, a Voronoi-based heuristic, and the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II). A novel Multiobjective Optimization Design (MOOD)-based classification framework is incorporated to facilitate decision making across the Pareto front. The methodology is validated on three benchmark MIMO plants, demonstrating its robustness and generalizability. The results highlight that the NSGA-II controller achieves the lowest IADU value of 0.3694 in the mass damper system while maintaining acceptable performance metrics. The inclusion of a PID-split strategy further enhances system flexibility. This study emphasizes the value of metaheuristics in navigating complex design spaces and delivering tailored control solutions for multiobjective scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14183630
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metaheuristic-Based PID Controller Design with MOOD Decision Support Applied to Benchmark Industrial Systems

Wilson Pavón
1 citations
Electronics
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.21
article

Metaheuristic-Based PID Controller Design with MOOD Decision Support Applied to Benchmark Industrial Systems

Wilson Pavón
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for the multiobjective tuning of MIMO proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers using advanced metaheuristic strategies. The proposed approach formulates a cost function based on two conflicting performance criteria—the integral of absolute error (IAE) and the integral of absolute derivative of control (IADU)—to explore the trade-off between tracking performance and control effort systematically. Three metaheuristic techniques are employed: stochastic hill climbing, a Voronoi-based heuristic, and the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II). A novel Multiobjective Optimization Design (MOOD)-based classification framework is incorporated to facilitate decision making across the Pareto front. The methodology is validated on three benchmark MIMO plants, demonstrating its robustness and generalizability. The results highlight that the NSGA-II controller achieves the lowest IADU value of 0.3694 in the mass damper system while maintaining acceptable performance metrics. The inclusion of a PID-split strategy further enhances system flexibility. This study emphasizes the value of metaheuristics in navigating complex design spaces and delivering tailored control solutions for multiobjective scenarios.

ElectronicsVol. 14(18)
Universidad UTE (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Metaheuristic-Based PID Controller Design with MOOD Decision Support Applied to Benchmark Industrial Systems — Wilson Pavón · Electronics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS