A stress-reduction eHealth intervention for healthcare workers: a pilot implementation study

Introduction Public health and policy require effective health strategies for diverse contexts. Despite numerous studies, a gap exists in translating knowledge to real-world scenarios. The RESPOND study’s stepped-care intervention has shown efficacy in anxiety and depression among healthcare workers, recognized by the European Commission as a best practice. Conducting a pilot trial in Madrid, we aimed to address this research-to-practice gap. Objectives After evaluating a previous randomized controlled trial, we adapted our intervention for a primary care center in Madrid, implementing it over 5-6 weeks in November-December 2023. We used two strategies: remote delivery via app or website with weekly calls, and hybrid, with group sessions instead of calls. Methods Gathering data included sociodemographic (age, gender, and type of job), clinical (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10), and qualitative insights through interviews, to explore implementation outcomes from Proctor’s model (Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, and some ideas for future large-scale implementation). We used mixed methods to analyse data. For the quantative data, we used descriptive statistics such as means, frequencies and percentages to describe the results. For qualitative data, interview transcriptions were analysed following thematic analysis guidelines. Results We included 17 out of 39 healthcare workers (44%) working at the primary care center, the sample included 8 doctors, 5 medical residents, 3 nurses, and 1 social worker. Only 3 were male. Over half chose the hybrid option, with 2 dropouts. Regarding clinical information, 88% of participants initially reported psychological distress, but after the intervention, this dropped to 66%. Participants found the intervention timely and appropriate, with an average satisfaction rating of 8 out of 10. Conclusions Preliminary findings show the intervention was well-received, and both strategies were successful, reaching a broad audience. Thematic analysis of the interviews is still ongoing. Preliminary results suggest that these strategies are appropriate /feasible for the Madrilenian healthcare system. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.520
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A stress-reduction eHealth intervention for healthcare workers: a pilot implementation study

Río Aguilar, María Fe Bravo‐Ortiz, Carmen Bayón, B. García-Vázquez
European Psychiatry
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

A stress-reduction eHealth intervention for healthcare workers: a pilot implementation study

Río Aguilar, María Fe Bravo‐Ortiz, Carmen Bayón, B. García-Vázquez
article en

Abstract

Introduction Public health and policy require effective health strategies for diverse contexts. Despite numerous studies, a gap exists in translating knowledge to real-world scenarios. The RESPOND study’s stepped-care intervention has shown efficacy in anxiety and depression among healthcare workers, recognized by the European Commission as a best practice. Conducting a pilot trial in Madrid, we aimed to address this research-to-practice gap. Objectives After evaluating a previous randomized controlled trial, we adapted our intervention for a primary care center in Madrid, implementing it over 5-6 weeks in November-December 2023. We used two strategies: remote delivery via app or website with weekly calls, and hybrid, with group sessions instead of calls. Methods Gathering data included sociodemographic (age, gender, and type of job), clinical (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K-10), and qualitative insights through interviews, to explore implementation outcomes from Proctor’s model (Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, and some ideas for future large-scale implementation). We used mixed methods to analyse data. For the quantative data, we used descriptive statistics such as means, frequencies and percentages to describe the results. For qualitative data, interview transcriptions were analysed following thematic analysis guidelines. Results We included 17 out of 39 healthcare workers (44%) working at the primary care center, the sample included 8 doctors, 5 medical residents, 3 nurses, and 1 social worker. Only 3 were male. Over half chose the hybrid option, with 2 dropouts. Regarding clinical information, 88% of participants initially reported psychological distress, but after the intervention, this dropped to 66%. Participants found the intervention timely and appropriate, with an average satisfaction rating of 8 out of 10. Conclusions Preliminary findings show the intervention was well-received, and both strategies were successful, reaching a broad audience. Thematic analysis of the interviews is still ongoing. Preliminary results suggest that these strategies are appropriate /feasible for the Madrilenian healthcare system. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.