Anxiety, depression, and negative affect in women with and without fertility issues: a network comparison study

Introduction Infertility is a biopsychosocial crisis. While there are studies demonstrating heightened negative affect (e.g., depression and anxiety) in women undergoing in vitro Fertilization (IVF), the findings are still inconsistent. The network paradigm allows for a more in-depth examination of symptom dynamics behind specific psychopathological states. A recent development allows one to compare networks from different groups using three characteristics: global strength (overall level of network node connectivity), edge strength (level of association between symptoms), and network structure (comparing all edges in the network across two groups). Objectives This study aims to compare the networks of anxiety, depression, and negative affect across women who have fertility issues or undergoing IVF and women without these issues. Methods Sample 1 consisted of 197 women with fertility issues (age: M = 37.73, SD =5.13) and 370 women without such issues (age: M = 36.25, SD = 6). Sample 2 consisted of 205 women undergoing IVF (M = 40; SD = 5.29) and 222 mothers without fertility issues (M=28; SD = 4. 93). Sample 3 consisted of 162 women undergoing IVF (M= 35.58; SD=5.04) and 129 mothers without fertility issues (M= 34.37; SD= 4.94). PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire; depression measure) was administered to the sample 1, GAD (generalized anxiety disorder measure) was administered to sample 2, and PANAS - NA (negative affect measure) was administered to sample 3. NetworkComparisonTest R package was used to compare the networks. EBICglasso was used to estimate the networks. Results Regarding the depression symptoms (sample 1; image 1) - the networks across the two groups are highly similar with respect to overall connectivity (S =.051; p = .73) and overall network structure (M = .16, p =.87). Regarding generalized anxiety symptoms (sample 2; image 2), the findings are replicated with overall connectivity being the same across the two groups (S =.10, p = .34) and network structure being the same across the two groups (M = .28, p= .09). Finally, the negative affect (sample 3; image 3) network connectivity (S = .02, p = .93) and network structure (M = .23, p = .53) are identical across the two groups. Image 1: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions The networks of negative affect, depression, and anxiety are highly similar across women with fertility issues and women without such issues. Therefore, fertility issues do not seem to affect the structure of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and negative affect. Finally, it is argued here that the knowledge of these disorders (and negative affect) can be generalized to the population of women who have fertility issues. Disclosure of Interest N. Ćirović Grant / Research support from: Nikola Ćirović was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., J. Opsenica Kostić Grant / Research support from: Jelena Opsenica Kostić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Mitrović Grant / Research support from: Milica Mitrović was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Guberinić Grant / Research support from: Mila Guberinić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Spasić Šnele Grant / Research support from: Miljana Spasić Šnele was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., I. Janković Grant / Research support from: Ivana Janković was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Trenkić Grant / Research support from: Milan Trenkić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.425
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anxiety, depression, and negative affect in women with and without fertility issues: a network comparison study

Jelena Kostić, Nikola Ćirović, Miljana Spasić Šnele, M Mitrović et al.
European Psychiatry
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Anxiety, depression, and negative affect in women with and without fertility issues: a network comparison study

Jelena Kostić, Nikola Ćirović, Miljana Spasić Šnele, M Mitrović, Ivana Janković, Mila Guberinić, Milan Trenkić
article en

Abstract

Introduction Infertility is a biopsychosocial crisis. While there are studies demonstrating heightened negative affect (e.g., depression and anxiety) in women undergoing in vitro Fertilization (IVF), the findings are still inconsistent. The network paradigm allows for a more in-depth examination of symptom dynamics behind specific psychopathological states. A recent development allows one to compare networks from different groups using three characteristics: global strength (overall level of network node connectivity), edge strength (level of association between symptoms), and network structure (comparing all edges in the network across two groups). Objectives This study aims to compare the networks of anxiety, depression, and negative affect across women who have fertility issues or undergoing IVF and women without these issues. Methods Sample 1 consisted of 197 women with fertility issues (age: M = 37.73, SD =5.13) and 370 women without such issues (age: M = 36.25, SD = 6). Sample 2 consisted of 205 women undergoing IVF (M = 40; SD = 5.29) and 222 mothers without fertility issues (M=28; SD = 4. 93). Sample 3 consisted of 162 women undergoing IVF (M= 35.58; SD=5.04) and 129 mothers without fertility issues (M= 34.37; SD= 4.94). PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire; depression measure) was administered to the sample 1, GAD (generalized anxiety disorder measure) was administered to sample 2, and PANAS - NA (negative affect measure) was administered to sample 3. NetworkComparisonTest R package was used to compare the networks. EBICglasso was used to estimate the networks. Results Regarding the depression symptoms (sample 1; image 1) - the networks across the two groups are highly similar with respect to overall connectivity (S =.051; p = .73) and overall network structure (M = .16, p =.87). Regarding generalized anxiety symptoms (sample 2; image 2), the findings are replicated with overall connectivity being the same across the two groups (S =.10, p = .34) and network structure being the same across the two groups (M = .28, p= .09). Finally, the negative affect (sample 3; image 3) network connectivity (S = .02, p = .93) and network structure (M = .23, p = .53) are identical across the two groups. Image 1: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions The networks of negative affect, depression, and anxiety are highly similar across women with fertility issues and women without such issues. Therefore, fertility issues do not seem to affect the structure of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and negative affect. Finally, it is argued here that the knowledge of these disorders (and negative affect) can be generalized to the population of women who have fertility issues. Disclosure of Interest N. Ćirović Grant / Research support from: Nikola Ćirović was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., J. Opsenica Kostić Grant / Research support from: Jelena Opsenica Kostić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Mitrović Grant / Research support from: Milica Mitrović was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Guberinić Grant / Research support from: Mila Guberinić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Spasić Šnele Grant / Research support from: Miljana Spasić Šnele was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., I. Janković Grant / Research support from: Ivana Janković was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe., M. Trenkić Grant / Research support from: Milan Trenkić was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, #GRANT No 1568, Identity Crisis in Women Facing Infertility: Mixed Methods Approach – InsideMe.

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
University of Nis (RS)
Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.