Does motivation and effort predict improvement on psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia (SZ)?

Introduction Previous research suggests that motivational factors relate to psychosocial functioning in SZ, both concurrently (Tobe et al. Compr Psychiat 2016; 65 103-109) and at follow-up (Fervaha et al. Acta Psychiat Scand 2014; 130 290-299). Importantly, no study has examined the influence of baseline motivation on the rate of change in response to rehabilitation Objectives 1. To study the relationship between baseline measures of motivation/ effort with psychosocial functioning at follow-up 2. To examine if motivation/ effort predict individual change in psychosocial functioning Methods Participants Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics Results Figures 1 and 2 show individuals slopes for PSP and FAST, with a thick red line representing the average group slopes. For both PSP and FAST, models with only time as the independent variable and random intercepts indicated that time was a significant predictor ( PSP: t=10.65, p<.0001; FAST: t =-6.13, p<.0001). Baseline motivation/ effort → follow-up psychosocial functioning No significant correlations were found for neither PSP scores ( QLS: ρ=-.018, S=2343.3, p=.93, IMI: P=.23, t=1.09, p=.28, effort: ρ=.001, S=2297.3, p=.99) nor FAST scores ( QLS: ρ=-.16, S=2674.9, p=.45, IMI: P=-.02, t=-0.09, p=.92, effort: ρ=.07, S=2128, p=.72). Motivation → change in psychosocial functioning For PSP, the interaction model (Table 2) shows that the interaction of effort and timepoint significantly predicts PSP scores Variable Frequency Mean/ percentage Standard deviation Age 30 40.97 12.9 Gender 30 Male 19 63% Female 11 37% Years of Education 24 11.42 3.06 Diagnosis 30 … Schizophrenia 23 73% … Schizoaffective disorder 7 23% Figure 1. Individual slopes for PSP scores Figure 2. Individual slopes for FAST scores Image: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions Patients showed an improvement after rehabilitation. Effort can explain this trend. Finally, unlike previous studies, basal motivation did not predict follow-up psychosocial functioning Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2042
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does motivation and effort predict improvement on psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia (SZ)?

Manuel J. Cuesta, A. Ballesteros, Juan Ignacio Arrarás, X. Ansorena et al.
European Psychiatry
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Does motivation and effort predict improvement on psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia (SZ)?

Manuel J. Cuesta, A. Ballesteros, Juan Ignacio Arrarás, X. Ansorena, Ana M. Sánchez-Torres, Amalia Zarzuela, E. Fernández Rosado, J. Chato, F. Gorriz
article en

Abstract

Introduction Previous research suggests that motivational factors relate to psychosocial functioning in SZ, both concurrently (Tobe et al. Compr Psychiat 2016; 65 103-109) and at follow-up (Fervaha et al. Acta Psychiat Scand 2014; 130 290-299). Importantly, no study has examined the influence of baseline motivation on the rate of change in response to rehabilitation Objectives 1. To study the relationship between baseline measures of motivation/ effort with psychosocial functioning at follow-up 2. To examine if motivation/ effort predict individual change in psychosocial functioning Methods Participants Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics Results Figures 1 and 2 show individuals slopes for PSP and FAST, with a thick red line representing the average group slopes. For both PSP and FAST, models with only time as the independent variable and random intercepts indicated that time was a significant predictor ( PSP: t=10.65, p<.0001; FAST: t =-6.13, p<.0001). Baseline motivation/ effort → follow-up psychosocial functioning No significant correlations were found for neither PSP scores ( QLS: ρ=-.018, S=2343.3, p=.93, IMI: P=.23, t=1.09, p=.28, effort: ρ=.001, S=2297.3, p=.99) nor FAST scores ( QLS: ρ=-.16, S=2674.9, p=.45, IMI: P=-.02, t=-0.09, p=.92, effort: ρ=.07, S=2128, p=.72). Motivation → change in psychosocial functioning For PSP, the interaction model (Table 2) shows that the interaction of effort and timepoint significantly predicts PSP scores Variable Frequency Mean/ percentage Standard deviation Age 30 40.97 12.9 Gender 30 Male 19 63% Female 11 37% Years of Education 24 11.42 3.06 Diagnosis 30 … Schizophrenia 23 73% … Schizoaffective disorder 7 23% Figure 1. Individual slopes for PSP scores Figure 2. Individual slopes for FAST scores Image: Image 2: Image 3: Conclusions Patients showed an improvement after rehabilitation. Effort can explain this trend. Finally, unlike previous studies, basal motivation did not predict follow-up psychosocial functioning Disclosure of Interest None Declared

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES), Servicio Navarro de Salud (ES), Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (ES), Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.