Validation of the Korean Version of the Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Patients with Chronic Pain

Introduction The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used self-report tool for evaluating pain-related catastrophizing. In response to the need for more efficient diagnostic tools in clinical environments, the PCS has been shortened from 13 to 4 items in developing the brief version. Objectives The objectives of this study were: (1) to examine the factor structure of a Korean-language version of the brief K-PCS and (2) to assess the reliability and validity of the brief K-PCS. Methods A total of 131 patients seeking treatment at a tertiary pain center in Daejeon, Korea, participated. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with maximum-likelihood estimation was performed to evaluate the adequacy of the one-factor model. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and Pearson correlations were calculated to investigate internal consistency and 2-week test-retest stability of the brief K-PCS, respectively. For concurrent validity, Pearson correlations were also calculated to examine the relationships between the brief K-PCS and various outcome measures. Results The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the adequacy of the brief K-PCS’s unifactor structure, indicated by excellent fit indices (CFI = .999, TLI = .996, SRMR = .039). The brief K-PCS exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .83). Test-retest correlations over a 2-week interval was .744 (p < .001), indicating high stability. For concurrent validity, the brief K-PCS showed significant positive correlations with measures of depression, fearful thinking, physical response, avoidance, and pain-related anxiety (p < .001), and significant negative correlations with quality of life measures, including physical, psychological, social relationships, environmental, and general quality of life (p < .001). Conclusions The brief K-PCS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pain catastrophizing in a Korean patient sample with chronic pain. Disclosure of Interest H. Yang Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government(NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), J. M. Park Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. B. Cho Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. Y. Lee Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), C. Noh Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), C. Roh Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. Cho Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychiatry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.547
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Venom Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Korean Version of the Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Patients with Chronic Pain

Hee Won Yang, S. B. Cho, Changhyun Roh, S. Y. Lee et al.
European Psychiatry
Healthcare and Venom Research
article

Validation of the Korean Version of the Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Patients with Chronic Pain

Hee Won Yang, S. B. Cho, Changhyun Roh, S. Y. Lee, Jong Moon Park, C.H. Noh, S. Cho
article en

Abstract

Introduction The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a widely used self-report tool for evaluating pain-related catastrophizing. In response to the need for more efficient diagnostic tools in clinical environments, the PCS has been shortened from 13 to 4 items in developing the brief version. Objectives The objectives of this study were: (1) to examine the factor structure of a Korean-language version of the brief K-PCS and (2) to assess the reliability and validity of the brief K-PCS. Methods A total of 131 patients seeking treatment at a tertiary pain center in Daejeon, Korea, participated. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with maximum-likelihood estimation was performed to evaluate the adequacy of the one-factor model. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and Pearson correlations were calculated to investigate internal consistency and 2-week test-retest stability of the brief K-PCS, respectively. For concurrent validity, Pearson correlations were also calculated to examine the relationships between the brief K-PCS and various outcome measures. Results The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the adequacy of the brief K-PCS’s unifactor structure, indicated by excellent fit indices (CFI = .999, TLI = .996, SRMR = .039). The brief K-PCS exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .83). Test-retest correlations over a 2-week interval was .744 (p < .001), indicating high stability. For concurrent validity, the brief K-PCS showed significant positive correlations with measures of depression, fearful thinking, physical response, avoidance, and pain-related anxiety (p < .001), and significant negative correlations with quality of life measures, including physical, psychological, social relationships, environmental, and general quality of life (p < .001). Conclusions The brief K-PCS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing pain catastrophizing in a Korean patient sample with chronic pain. Disclosure of Interest H. Yang Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government(NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), J. M. Park Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. B. Cho Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. Y. Lee Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), C. Noh Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), C. Roh Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752), S. Cho Grant / Research support from: National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03050752)

European PsychiatryVol. 68(S1)
Chungnam National University (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Healthcare and Venom Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.