An International Comparative Reliability and Concurrent Validity Assessment of the Multi-Level Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) 2.0
Although not all scales were available in all countries, overall, the results support the "functional similarity" of the major scale areas across the four pilot countries and support the underlying extensions of the Demand-Control theoretical constructs to the multi-level psychosocial work assessment for the promotion of workers' health and wellbeing as suggested by the new ADC model.
Authors
- Sung‐Il Cho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-1494)
- Robert Karasek
- Sarven S. McLinton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-3860)
- Maureen F. Dollard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3128-8727)
- Maren Formazin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-9543)
- BongKyoo Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-9378)
- I.L.D. Houtman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-0784)
- Wilfred Agbenyikey
- Jian Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-5956)
Institutions
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Frederiksberg Hospital (DK)
- Korea National Institute of Health (KR)
- Kintampo Health Research Centre (GH)
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Published
- 2025-09-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22091435
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Workplace Health and Well-being
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.82