Evaluation of the online <scp>TOGETHER</scp> relationship and financial education program for couples

Abstract Objective This study evaluated the TOGETHER program's effectiveness by comparing pre‐ and postintervention assessments of psychological distress, relationship functioning, and financial management among online, in‐person, and control groups. Background The COVID‐19 pandemic necessitated the shift of couple relationship education programs online, including the TOGETHER program. This study evaluated whether the online version is as effective as the in‐person program. Method Self‐report data from 604 couples recruited from the Washington, DC, metropolitan area were analyzed using dyadic multilevel models to test mean differences from pre‐ to postintervention within and across groups, controlling for demographics and baseline outcomes. Results The online group's improvements in positive conflict management, conflict management satisfaction, relationship quality, shared time with partner, and relationship satisfaction, as well as reductions in psychological distress and negative conflict management, were not significantly different from those of the in‐person group. Improvements in positive conflict management, relationship quality and satisfaction, and reduction in negative conflict management were significantly different from the control group. There were no significant differences between the intervention groups in attrition and attendance rates. Conclusion The online TOGETHER program is as effective as the in‐person version in improving individual well‐being and relationship functioning. Implications This study illustrates that online couple relationship programs can offer a vital alternative for couples facing barriers to attending in‐person programs.