Exploring the Impact of Collegiate Experiences on Academic Success and Retention for Non‐Traditional Students at Community Colleges: A Machine Learning Approach

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between community college students’ demographic characteristics, collegiate experiences, and academic outcomes using data from the 2024 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). Guided by Astin's Input‐Environment‐Outcome (I‐E‐O) Model, the study explores how student engagement factors—such as active and collaborative learning, student effort, academic challenge, student‐faculty interaction, and institutional support—alongside demographic variables, relate to college GPA and total credit hours earned. The purpose is to compare traditional statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches in terms of their ability to predict academic success. Hierarchical regression and three ML algorithms—decision tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost—were applied to identify patterns and evaluate model performance. Engagement factors such as active learning and academic challenge were modestly associated with academic outcomes. While XGBoost performed best among the predictive models, the overall improvement in performance was limited. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how demographic and engagement variables can be jointly examined, and how ML, through the application of diverse algorithms and data‐splitting techniques, can serve as a complementary tool for testing research models and exploring variable influence, thereby enhancing confidence in interpreting results from large‐scale educational research. We focus on non‐traditional students in community colleges and clarify how CCSSE benchmarks map onto the constructs examined. We also discuss the practical interpretation of results and position supervised ML as a complementary tool that adds robustness via cross‐validation and out‐of‐sample testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Community Colleges
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.70019
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Impact of Collegiate Experiences on Academic Success and Retention for Non‐Traditional Students at Community Colleges: A Machine Learning Approach

Seung Won Yoon, Sarah Rodriguez, JoHyun Kim, Jungmin Lee
New Directions for Community Colleges
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Exploring the Impact of Collegiate Experiences on Academic Success and Retention for Non‐Traditional Students at Community Colleges: A Machine Learning Approach

Seung Won Yoon, Sarah Rodriguez, JoHyun Kim, Jungmin Lee
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between community college students’ demographic characteristics, collegiate experiences, and academic outcomes using data from the 2024 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). Guided by Astin's Input‐Environment‐Outcome (I‐E‐O) Model, the study explores how student engagement factors—such as active and collaborative learning, student effort, academic challenge, student‐faculty interaction, and institutional support—alongside demographic variables, relate to college GPA and total credit hours earned. The purpose is to compare traditional statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches in terms of their ability to predict academic success. Hierarchical regression and three ML algorithms—decision tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost—were applied to identify patterns and evaluate model performance. Engagement factors such as active learning and academic challenge were modestly associated with academic outcomes. While XGBoost performed best among the predictive models, the overall improvement in performance was limited. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how demographic and engagement variables can be jointly examined, and how ML, through the application of diverse algorithms and data‐splitting techniques, can serve as a complementary tool for testing research models and exploring variable influence, thereby enhancing confidence in interpreting results from large‐scale educational research. We focus on non‐traditional students in community colleges and clarify how CCSSE benchmarks map onto the constructs examined. We also discuss the practical interpretation of results and position supervised ML as a complementary tool that adds robustness via cross‐validation and out‐of‐sample testing.

New Directions for Community CollegesVol. 2025(212)
Kentucky Department of Education (US), University of Kentucky (US), Virginia Tech (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.