O mądrym mężu, który wymyślił bogów. Mit antropogenetyczny w dramacie satyrowym „Syzyf”

The subject of this analysis is a fragment from the satyr play Sisyphus (T63 Laks, Most = 88 B25 DK = 43 F19 Snell). Although Sextus Empiricus (Adv. math. 9.54), to whom we owe the preservation of this fragment, attributed its authorship to Critias, a brutal Athenian politician from the 5th century BCE, a member of the oligarchic faction, also known as a poet. However, it is more likely that Sisyphus was written by Euripides. Thus, the text functions as a parody of sophistic discourse, voiced by the mythological trickster Sisyphus. The character’s monologue unfolds within a carefully structured narrative framework rooted in traditional anthropogonic myths. The tale of the “first human” rising above an animalistic existence (thēriṓdēs bíos, vv. 1–2) prompts reflections on the origins of religion, which is depicted as an instrument of manipulation: a fictional construct employed by powerful individuals to control the masses. This study situates the Sisyphus fragment within the broader intellectual context of late 5th-century BCE Athens, demonstrating how its narrative strategy allows the author to explore the boundaries of myth and its function in contemporary theatre.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2025.xxxv.1.6
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O mądrym mężu, który wymyślił bogów. Mit antropogenetyczny w dramacie satyrowym „Syzyf”

Jan Skarbek-Kazanecki
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Language and Culture
article

O mądrym mężu, który wymyślił bogów. Mit antropogenetyczny w dramacie satyrowym „Syzyf”

Jan Skarbek-Kazanecki
article en

Abstract

The subject of this analysis is a fragment from the satyr play Sisyphus (T63 Laks, Most = 88 B25 DK = 43 F19 Snell). Although Sextus Empiricus (Adv. math. 9.54), to whom we owe the preservation of this fragment, attributed its authorship to Critias, a brutal Athenian politician from the 5th century BCE, a member of the oligarchic faction, also known as a poet. However, it is more likely that Sisyphus was written by Euripides. Thus, the text functions as a parody of sophistic discourse, voiced by the mythological trickster Sisyphus. The character’s monologue unfolds within a carefully structured narrative framework rooted in traditional anthropogonic myths. The tale of the “first human” rising above an animalistic existence (thēriṓdēs bíos, vv. 1–2) prompts reflections on the origins of religion, which is depicted as an instrument of manipulation: a fictional construct employed by powerful individuals to control the masses. This study situates the Sisyphus fragment within the broader intellectual context of late 5th-century BCE Athens, demonstrating how its narrative strategy allows the author to explore the boundaries of myth and its function in contemporary theatre.

Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et LatinaeVol. 35(1)
University of Łódź (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Language and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.