Management of Mandibular Fractures at a High-Volume Educational Center—A Retrospective Study

<b>Background:</b> Mandibular fractures are often treated with open reduction and internal fixation in order to restore function and anatomy. This study analyzes postoperative complications and outcomes over one year at a high-volume teaching hospital, focusing on fracture types, treatment methods, and the impact of providers' experience. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included patients 12 years of age or older with mandibular fractures resulting from trauma during a 1-year period, January-December 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. Medical records were reviewed, and patient data was collected. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group 1 (surgical treatment), Group 2 (closed treatment, i.e., dental splints, arch bars/eyelets), and Group 3 (observation/soft diet). The results were tabulated, and standard descriptive statistics were used. <b>Results:</b> 141 patients with 223 mandibular fractures met inclusion criteria. Throughout all groups, 18 surgically treated patients (12.7%) and one patient treated with arch bars (0.07%) required additional unintended surgical procedure such as plate removal with/without re-plating, or orthognathic surgery for occlusal correction. <b>Conclusions:</b> The complication rates in this cohort align with the existing literature, though variations may origin from limited sample size, short follow-up and patient comorbidities. The involvement of less experienced surgeons during on-call hours most likely contributed to outcome variability. Despite challenges, most patients had favorable outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186467
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of Mandibular Fractures at a High-Volume Educational Center—A Retrospective Study

Helya Hashemi, Payam Farzad, Yousuf Qundos
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
2.01
article

Management of Mandibular Fractures at a High-Volume Educational Center—A Retrospective Study

Helya Hashemi, Payam Farzad, Yousuf Qundos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Mandibular fractures are often treated with open reduction and internal fixation in order to restore function and anatomy. This study analyzes postoperative complications and outcomes over one year at a high-volume teaching hospital, focusing on fracture types, treatment methods, and the impact of providers' experience. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included patients 12 years of age or older with mandibular fractures resulting from trauma during a 1-year period, January-December 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. Medical records were reviewed, and patient data was collected. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group 1 (surgical treatment), Group 2 (closed treatment, i.e., dental splints, arch bars/eyelets), and Group 3 (observation/soft diet). The results were tabulated, and standard descriptive statistics were used. <b>Results:</b> 141 patients with 223 mandibular fractures met inclusion criteria. Throughout all groups, 18 surgically treated patients (12.7%) and one patient treated with arch bars (0.07%) required additional unintended surgical procedure such as plate removal with/without re-plating, or orthognathic surgery for occlusal correction. <b>Conclusions:</b> The complication rates in this cohort align with the existing literature, though variations may origin from limited sample size, short follow-up and patient comorbidities. The involvement of less experienced surgeons during on-call hours most likely contributed to outcome variability. Despite challenges, most patients had favorable outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.