Development, validation and reliability of work-related low back pain questionnaire for nursing professionals

INTRODUCTION: Multiple risk factors induce work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), resulting in a higher prevalence of work-related low back pain among nurses. This research aimed to develop and establish the validity and reliability of work-related low back pain questionnaire (WRLBPQ) for nursing professionals. METHODS: This study employed a methodology centered on the development, reliability, and validation of a scale. Five experts with a master's degree in the relevant subject and a minimum of 10 years of academic experience participated in the first focal group discussion. Subsequently, thirty-five specialists engaged in the evaluation of content validity for the WRLBP questionnaire. To assess reliability, a sample of 200 staff nurses employed in hospitals was chosen to participate in this questionnaire. RESULTS: The newly developed WRLBPQ tool demonstrates strong scale-level content validity, achieving a score exceeding 0.78 for each item. The kappa values for each item ranged from 0.97 for item quality to 1 for item content, indicating excellent agreement. The universal acceptance of each item was 0.91 for quality and 1 for content. The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to determine test-retest reliability, yielding a result of rho = 1 for session 1 and rho = 0.82 for session 2. Inter-rater reliability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), with values of 0.76 for rater A and 0.86 for rater B, alongside a Cronbach alpha of 0.98. CONCLUSION: The WRLBP questionnaire, the first measurement tool among nursing professionals, is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating WRLBP among nursing professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2025.e6110
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, validation and reliability of work-related low back pain questionnaire for nursing professionals

Arushi Mishra, Deeksha Sharma, Sohel M G Ahmed, Zamilur Rahman et al.
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Development, validation and reliability of work-related low back pain questionnaire for nursing professionals

Arushi Mishra, Deeksha Sharma, Sohel M G Ahmed, Zamilur Rahman, Mohammad Jahirul Islam, Umang Singal, Saifur Rahman, Pranshul Garlu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multiple risk factors induce work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), resulting in a higher prevalence of work-related low back pain among nurses. This research aimed to develop and establish the validity and reliability of work-related low back pain questionnaire (WRLBPQ) for nursing professionals. METHODS: This study employed a methodology centered on the development, reliability, and validation of a scale. Five experts with a master's degree in the relevant subject and a minimum of 10 years of academic experience participated in the first focal group discussion. Subsequently, thirty-five specialists engaged in the evaluation of content validity for the WRLBP questionnaire. To assess reliability, a sample of 200 staff nurses employed in hospitals was chosen to participate in this questionnaire. RESULTS: The newly developed WRLBPQ tool demonstrates strong scale-level content validity, achieving a score exceeding 0.78 for each item. The kappa values for each item ranged from 0.97 for item quality to 1 for item content, indicating excellent agreement. The universal acceptance of each item was 0.91 for quality and 1 for content. The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to determine test-retest reliability, yielding a result of rho = 1 for session 1 and rho = 0.82 for session 2. Inter-rater reliability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), with values of 0.76 for rater A and 0.86 for rater B, alongside a Cronbach alpha of 0.98. CONCLUSION: The WRLBP questionnaire, the first measurement tool among nursing professionals, is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating WRLBP among nursing professionals.

Revista Pesquisa em FisioterapiaVol. 15
Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana (IN), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College (BD), Centre for Global Health Research (CA), Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology (BD), Jerash University (JO), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.