The “Tradition of Borrowing” and the Development of National Law

The article is devoted to the topic of borrowings in law, its comparative legal aspect, concretization and structuring of its content through setting scientific tasks and determining ways to solve them. Scientific hypotheses have been formulated that require development, taking into account the conclusions and judgments outlined in the article. These include assumptions about the special nature of reproduction and the repeatability of the practice of borrowing in law, its reflection of the objective process of the evolution of law; the complexity of the phenomenon of legal borrowing and the heterogeneity of their manifestations; the scientific validity of their differentiation into voluntary and imposed, correct and incorrect, direct and reverse (return); the possibility of practical borrowing of technologies of legal transformations — reforms and modernizations; the need to improve mechanisms for protecting the national legal order from the expansion of foreign legal models. Attention is drawn to the ideological potential of the topic under consideration and the fundamental importance of legal ideology for the domestic legal system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61205/jzsp.2025.3.1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Tradition of Borrowing” and the Development of National Law

T. Ya. Khabrieva
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Chinese history and philosophy
article

The “Tradition of Borrowing” and the Development of National Law

T. Ya. Khabrieva
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topic of borrowings in law, its comparative legal aspect, concretization and structuring of its content through setting scientific tasks and determining ways to solve them. Scientific hypotheses have been formulated that require development, taking into account the conclusions and judgments outlined in the article. These include assumptions about the special nature of reproduction and the repeatability of the practice of borrowing in law, its reflection of the objective process of the evolution of law; the complexity of the phenomenon of legal borrowing and the heterogeneity of their manifestations; the scientific validity of their differentiation into voluntary and imposed, correct and incorrect, direct and reverse (return); the possibility of practical borrowing of technologies of legal transformations — reforms and modernizations; the need to improve mechanisms for protecting the national legal order from the expansion of foreign legal models. Attention is drawn to the ideological potential of the topic under consideration and the fundamental importance of legal ideology for the domestic legal system.

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative LawVol. 21(3)
The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The “Tradition of Borrowing” and the Development of National Law — T. Ya. Khabrieva · Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS