Application of Accounting Standards in the Valuation of Biological Assets: An Analysis of the Poultry Sector in Tungurahua, Ecuador
This study analyzes the application of International Accounting Standard IAS 41—Agriculture in poultry companies (ISIC A0146.03) in the province of Tungurahua, Ecuador, with the aim of evaluating the degree of regulatory compliance, the level of technical knowledge of accounting managers, and the impact of the lack of homogenization in the presentation of financial statements. The research is based on a quantitative–descriptive approach, through the application of a structured questionnaire to 26 representatives of poultry companies, complemented with the financial analysis of the activity during the period 2010–2024. The results show that the application of IAS 41 is not exhaustive or uniform, and various valuation methods are used that are not always aligned with the fair value approach required by the standard. Likewise, significant heterogeneity in accounting criteria is detected, which limits comparability and reduces the usefulness of financial information for decision-making. Most respondents have general but limited knowledge of the standard, which affects its technical implementation. The study concludes that it is necessary to strengthen specialized accounting training, establish sectoral standardization criteria, and promote regulatory supervision to ensure transparent, coherent, and useful financial information.
Authors
- Zonia del Rocío Chávez Hernández (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5497-2911)
- Liliana Priscila Campos Llerena (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-2171)
- Patricia Jiménez-Estrella
- César Salazar-Mejía
Institutions
- Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo (EC)
- Universidad Técnica de Ambato (EC)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of risk and financial management
- Published
- 2025-09-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18090509
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.68