(123) Request for a binding decision on whether the names <i>Impatiens yingjiangensis</i> S. Akiyama &amp; H. Ohba and <i>I. yingjingensis</i> Xin Q. Song &amp; al. (<i>Balsaminaceae</i>) are sufficiently alike to be confused

(123) Impatiens yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba (1995) [Angiosp.: Balsamin.] Impatiens yingjingensis Xin Q. Song, B.N. Song & Biao Yang (2024) [Angiosp.: Balsamin.] Akiyama & al. (in J. Jap. Bot. 70: 96. 1995) published a new species of Impatiens, I. yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba, named after its type locality, Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province, China. It is native to south-central China and is an accepted species in Flora of China. Song & al. (in PhytoKeys 242: 302. 2024) published another new species of Impatiens, I. yingjingensis Xin Q. Song, B.N. Song & Biao Yang, collected from the Yingjing area of the Giant Panda National park, Yingjing County, Sichuan Province and so also native to south-central China. Although we recognize the difference in the origin of the two epithets denoting distinct geographical localities in China, but still, due to the only one letter (“a”) distinguishing the two, we consider the names confusable both in spelling and pronunciation. Additionally, the two species were described from the same general area, i.e., south-central China. Probably Song & al. did not consider the names confusable and so chose the epithet yingjingensis, but in our view the two epithets look alike and create confusion. So, we are requesting a binding decision under Art. 53.4 as to whether I. yingjiangensis and I. yingjingensis are likely to be confused and should be treated as homonyms. If it is decided to treat them as homonyms, then I. yingjingensis, from Sichuan Province, would need a new name. The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Director, CSIR-NBRI, Lucknow for providing facilities and to Dr. John McNeill for discussion and suggestions on this case. The first author would also like to thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi for DBT-JRF fellowship and the second author the Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi for the support (CRG/2021/000663). The manuscript has the institutional manuscript number CSIR-NBRI_MS/2025/06/02.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taxon
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.70048
Primary Topic
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(123) Request for a binding decision on whether the names Impatiens yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba and I. yingjingensis Xin Q. Song & al. (Balsaminaceae) are sufficiently alike to be confused

Konickal Mambetta Prabhukumar, Diksha Kumari
Taxon
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
article

(123) Request for a binding decision on whether the names Impatiens yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba and I. yingjingensis Xin Q. Song & al. (Balsaminaceae) are sufficiently alike to be confused

Konickal Mambetta Prabhukumar, Diksha Kumari
article en

Abstract

(123) Impatiens yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba (1995) [Angiosp.: Balsamin.] Impatiens yingjingensis Xin Q. Song, B.N. Song & Biao Yang (2024) [Angiosp.: Balsamin.] Akiyama & al. (in J. Jap. Bot. 70: 96. 1995) published a new species of Impatiens, I. yingjiangensis S. Akiyama & H. Ohba, named after its type locality, Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province, China. It is native to south-central China and is an accepted species in Flora of China. Song & al. (in PhytoKeys 242: 302. 2024) published another new species of Impatiens, I. yingjingensis Xin Q. Song, B.N. Song & Biao Yang, collected from the Yingjing area of the Giant Panda National park, Yingjing County, Sichuan Province and so also native to south-central China. Although we recognize the difference in the origin of the two epithets denoting distinct geographical localities in China, but still, due to the only one letter (“a”) distinguishing the two, we consider the names confusable both in spelling and pronunciation. Additionally, the two species were described from the same general area, i.e., south-central China. Probably Song & al. did not consider the names confusable and so chose the epithet yingjingensis, but in our view the two epithets look alike and create confusion. So, we are requesting a binding decision under Art. 53.4 as to whether I. yingjiangensis and I. yingjingensis are likely to be confused and should be treated as homonyms. If it is decided to treat them as homonyms, then I. yingjingensis, from Sichuan Province, would need a new name. The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Director, CSIR-NBRI, Lucknow for providing facilities and to Dr. John McNeill for discussion and suggestions on this case. The first author would also like to thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi for DBT-JRF fellowship and the second author the Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi for the support (CRG/2021/000663). The manuscript has the institutional manuscript number CSIR-NBRI_MS/2025/06/02.

TaxonVol. 74(5)
National Botanical Research Institute (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.