Comparative Assessment of Remote and Proximal NDVI Sensing for Predicting Wheat Agronomic Traits

Monitoring wheat traits across diverse environments requires reliable sensing tools that balance accuracy, cost, and scalability. This study compares the performance of proximal and UAV-derived NDVI sensing for predicting the key agronomic traits in winter wheat. The research was conducted at a long-term NPK field experiment on Haplic Chernozem soils in Rimski Šančevi, Serbia, using UAV multispectral imagery and a handheld proximal sensor to collect NDVI data across 400 micro-plots and six phenological stages. The UAV-derived NDVI achieved a higher mean value (0.71 vs. 0.60), lower coefficient of variation (29.2% vs. 33.0%), and stronger correlation with the POM readings (R2 = 0.92). For trait prediction, the UAV-based NDVI reached R2 values up to 0.95 for grain yield and 0.84 for plant height, outperforming the POM (maximum R2 = 0.94 and 0.83, respectively), and it showed superior temporal consistency (average R2 = 0.74 vs. 0.64). Although the POM performed comparably during mid-season under controlled conditions, its sensitivity to operator handling and limited spatial resolution reduced robustness in more variable field scenarios. A cost–benefit analysis revealed that the POM offers advantages in affordability, ease of use, and deployment in small-scale settings, while UAV systems are better suited for large-scale monitoring due to their higher spatial resolution and data richness. The findings highlight the importance of selecting sensing technologies based on biological context, operational goals, and resource constraints, and suggest that combining methods through stratified sampling may improve the efficiency and accuracy of crop monitoring in precision agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drones
Published
2025-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9090641
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Remote and Proximal NDVI Sensing for Predicting Wheat Agronomic Traits

Danijela Bursać Kovačević, Marko Kostić, Milan Mirosavljević, Vladimir Aćìn et al.
1 citations
Drones
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Comparative Assessment of Remote and Proximal NDVI Sensing for Predicting Wheat Agronomic Traits

Danijela Bursać Kovačević, Marko Kostić, Milan Mirosavljević, Vladimir Aćìn, Nataša Ljubičić, Krstan Kešelj, Zoran Stamenković, Antonio Scarfone, Nikola Stanković
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Monitoring wheat traits across diverse environments requires reliable sensing tools that balance accuracy, cost, and scalability. This study compares the performance of proximal and UAV-derived NDVI sensing for predicting the key agronomic traits in winter wheat. The research was conducted at a long-term NPK field experiment on Haplic Chernozem soils in Rimski Šančevi, Serbia, using UAV multispectral imagery and a handheld proximal sensor to collect NDVI data across 400 micro-plots and six phenological stages. The UAV-derived NDVI achieved a higher mean value (0.71 vs. 0.60), lower coefficient of variation (29.2% vs. 33.0%), and stronger correlation with the POM readings (R2 = 0.92). For trait prediction, the UAV-based NDVI reached R2 values up to 0.95 for grain yield and 0.84 for plant height, outperforming the POM (maximum R2 = 0.94 and 0.83, respectively), and it showed superior temporal consistency (average R2 = 0.74 vs. 0.64). Although the POM performed comparably during mid-season under controlled conditions, its sensitivity to operator handling and limited spatial resolution reduced robustness in more variable field scenarios. A cost–benefit analysis revealed that the POM offers advantages in affordability, ease of use, and deployment in small-scale settings, while UAV systems are better suited for large-scale monitoring due to their higher spatial resolution and data richness. The findings highlight the importance of selecting sensing technologies based on biological context, operational goals, and resource constraints, and suggest that combining methods through stratified sampling may improve the efficiency and accuracy of crop monitoring in precision agriculture.

DronesVol. 9(9)
University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Zagreb (HR), Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops (RS), Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (IT), BioSense Institute (RS)
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.