Subclavicular and Suprascapular Placement of Response Neurostimulator Generator: Two Unique Cases

Introduction.The Response Neurostimulation (RNS) system is a treatment modality for medical refractory epilepsy that monitors and responds to electrical signals that may indicate the onset of seizure activity.The RNS system consists of the depth electrode and/or cortical strip electrode in the seizure focus connected to a neurostimulator.The neurostimulator is placed within the skull to minimize system noise.However, there are cases in which placing the neurostimulator in the skull may not be ideal due to obstruction of future treatment/imaging or wound healing issues with the scalp.Methods.Two patients underwent trials for neurostimulator placement at different sites.The first patient required further treatment for a high-grade glioma, and the initial placement interfered with both radiation treatment and imaging quality.As a result, the generator was repositioned to the subclavicular area.The second patient experienced wound healing issues due to a thin scalp, which led to erosion and eventual device explantation.After discussion, the neurostimulator was successfully placed in the suprascapular/trapezius region. Results.Neurostimulator placement in non-traditional locations such as the subclavicular and suprascapular/trapezius positions provided electrocorticography with great signal and minimal noise contrary to previous assumptions. Conclusions.These encouraging findings highlight the potential for neurostimulators to be placed in unconventional locations for patients who benefit from the RNS system but face complications with cranial placement.In these two cases, the generators were ultimately placed in the subclavicular and suprascapular/trapezius regions, respectively.Both patients maintained excellent electrocorticography and continued to benefit from the RNS system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kansas Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol18.24436
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subclavicular and Suprascapular Placement of Response Neurostimulator Generator: Two Unique Cases

Chung Hae Park
Kansas Journal of Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Subclavicular and Suprascapular Placement of Response Neurostimulator Generator: Two Unique Cases

Chung Hae Park
article en

Abstract

Introduction.The Response Neurostimulation (RNS) system is a treatment modality for medical refractory epilepsy that monitors and responds to electrical signals that may indicate the onset of seizure activity.The RNS system consists of the depth electrode and/or cortical strip electrode in the seizure focus connected to a neurostimulator.The neurostimulator is placed within the skull to minimize system noise.However, there are cases in which placing the neurostimulator in the skull may not be ideal due to obstruction of future treatment/imaging or wound healing issues with the scalp.Methods.Two patients underwent trials for neurostimulator placement at different sites.The first patient required further treatment for a high-grade glioma, and the initial placement interfered with both radiation treatment and imaging quality.As a result, the generator was repositioned to the subclavicular area.The second patient experienced wound healing issues due to a thin scalp, which led to erosion and eventual device explantation.After discussion, the neurostimulator was successfully placed in the suprascapular/trapezius region. Results.Neurostimulator placement in non-traditional locations such as the subclavicular and suprascapular/trapezius positions provided electrocorticography with great signal and minimal noise contrary to previous assumptions. Conclusions.These encouraging findings highlight the potential for neurostimulators to be placed in unconventional locations for patients who benefit from the RNS system but face complications with cranial placement.In these two cases, the generators were ultimately placed in the subclavicular and suprascapular/trapezius regions, respectively.Both patients maintained excellent electrocorticography and continued to benefit from the RNS system.

Kansas Journal of MedicineVol. 18(S3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subclavicular and Suprascapular Placement of Response Neurostimulator Generator: Two Unique Cases — Chung Hae Park · Kansas Journal of Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS