Meta-analysis on beef cattle carcass chilling loss

Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate, through meta-analysis, the factors that influence the weight loss of beef cattle carcass during chilling. Scientific articles were searched on Scielo and Google Scholar platforms, following the PICO tool, which refers to population, intervention, comparison, and outcome, using the terms beef cattle, carcasses, sex of the animal, and the chilling loss, respectively. The following filters for the articles were used: peer view, English or Portuguese, and dated from 1990 onwards. The total of 154 articles were found on Scielo and 136 on Google Scholar. The database comprised 47 selected articles based on title, abstract criteria, and a final selection regarding data presentation. The Iterated Principal Factor method was used with the Varimax rotation method. The path diagram was used to show the factored model results. The variance of chilling breakage was ranked using a statistical software. The breakdown of bovine carcasses on chilling ranges from 0.47% to 4.93%, with an average of 2.24%. Better conformations and greater fat thickness determine lower carcass chilling losses. Higher body weights at slaughter and hot and cold carcasses provide smaller breaks in the carcass chilling whereas moisture loss depends on the animal size. Meta-analytical methods allow evaluating a larger number of samples, which indicate better values for variations, such as the influence of the animal size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2025.v60.03695
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis on beef cattle carcass chilling loss

Glênio Lopes dos Santos, Ana Carolina Fluck, Leonir Luíz Pascoal, João Restle et al.
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Meta-analysis on beef cattle carcass chilling loss

Glênio Lopes dos Santos, Ana Carolina Fluck, Leonir Luíz Pascoal, João Restle, Fabiano Nunes Vaz, Olmar Antônio Denardin Costa, Ricardo Zambarda Vaz
article en

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate, through meta-analysis, the factors that influence the weight loss of beef cattle carcass during chilling. Scientific articles were searched on Scielo and Google Scholar platforms, following the PICO tool, which refers to population, intervention, comparison, and outcome, using the terms beef cattle, carcasses, sex of the animal, and the chilling loss, respectively. The following filters for the articles were used: peer view, English or Portuguese, and dated from 1990 onwards. The total of 154 articles were found on Scielo and 136 on Google Scholar. The database comprised 47 selected articles based on title, abstract criteria, and a final selection regarding data presentation. The Iterated Principal Factor method was used with the Varimax rotation method. The path diagram was used to show the factored model results. The variance of chilling breakage was ranked using a statistical software. The breakdown of bovine carcasses on chilling ranges from 0.47% to 4.93%, with an average of 2.24%. Better conformations and greater fat thickness determine lower carcass chilling losses. Higher body weights at slaughter and hot and cold carcasses provide smaller breaks in the carcass chilling whereas moisture loss depends on the animal size. Meta-analytical methods allow evaluating a larger number of samples, which indicate better values for variations, such as the influence of the animal size.

Pesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraVol. 60
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.