Using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) Checklist at the Exercise Level to Assess the Completeness of Exercise Reporting: A Methodological Review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exercise reporting completeness at the exercise level using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist (a guideline for reporting of exercise trials, consisting of 19 items), explore the partial-credit versus traditional full-credit models of scoring completeness, and assess the reliability of scoring methods. DESIGN: Methodological review of randomized clinical trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched for trials investigating exercise for subacromial pain syndrome, published between January 2021 and February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials examining exercise in treatment and comparator arms for subacromial pain syndrome were included. Of 25 eligible studies, 10 were randomly selected for analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each exercise was scored using a modified CERT, employing a partial-credit model. Exercise-level mean scores were calculated for each study and compared to traditional study-level scores. Proportions of completeness and interrater reliability were calculated for each CERT item. RESULTS: The mean CERT total score of 7.3/20 using a partial-credit model (0, 0.5, or 1 point) across all exercises demonstrates inadequate exercise reporting, with lower scores indicating incomplete reporting. Traditional scoring (0 or 1 point) applied at the exercise level (using recoding) resulted in a judgment of less complete reporting, with a mean CERT score of 3.7/20, while traditional study-level scoring suggested more complete reporting (8.7/19). Reliability (kappa) was improved with partial-credit (mean k = 0.54) versus traditional study-level scoring (mean k = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Exercise-level CERT scoring with a partial-credit model details gaps in reporting and limitations of the traditional study-level scoring. This somewhat labor-intensive approach provides a more accurate and reliable assessment of exercise reporting completeness. JOSPT Methods 2025;1(3):102-112. Epub 15 September 2025. doi:10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0004

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOSPT Methods
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) Checklist at the Exercise Level to Assess the Completeness of Exercise Reporting: A Methodological Review

Mareli Klopper, Daniel Maddox, Marcel Dijkers, Ryan C. McConnell et al.
1 citations
JOSPT Methods
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
article

Using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) Checklist at the Exercise Level to Assess the Completeness of Exercise Reporting: A Methodological Review

Mareli Klopper, Daniel Maddox, Marcel Dijkers, Ryan C. McConnell, Tyler Miller, Anthony J. Mancini, Joshua A. Subialka, Ethan Vosburgh, Derek Pyle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exercise reporting completeness at the exercise level using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist (a guideline for reporting of exercise trials, consisting of 19 items), explore the partial-credit versus traditional full-credit models of scoring completeness, and assess the reliability of scoring methods. DESIGN: Methodological review of randomized clinical trials. LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched for trials investigating exercise for subacromial pain syndrome, published between January 2021 and February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials examining exercise in treatment and comparator arms for subacromial pain syndrome were included. Of 25 eligible studies, 10 were randomly selected for analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Each exercise was scored using a modified CERT, employing a partial-credit model. Exercise-level mean scores were calculated for each study and compared to traditional study-level scores. Proportions of completeness and interrater reliability were calculated for each CERT item. RESULTS: The mean CERT total score of 7.3/20 using a partial-credit model (0, 0.5, or 1 point) across all exercises demonstrates inadequate exercise reporting, with lower scores indicating incomplete reporting. Traditional scoring (0 or 1 point) applied at the exercise level (using recoding) resulted in a judgment of less complete reporting, with a mean CERT score of 3.7/20, while traditional study-level scoring suggested more complete reporting (8.7/19). Reliability (kappa) was improved with partial-credit (mean k = 0.54) versus traditional study-level scoring (mean k = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Exercise-level CERT scoring with a partial-credit model details gaps in reporting and limitations of the traditional study-level scoring. This somewhat labor-intensive approach provides a more accurate and reliable assessment of exercise reporting completeness. JOSPT Methods 2025;1(3):102-112. Epub 15 September 2025. doi:10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0004

JOSPT MethodsVol. 1(3)
Graceland University (US), Wayne State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.