Outcomes after Hallux Rigidus surgery: Are we measuring what is important to patients? A qualitative analysis of patient-identified outcomes
Post-HR surgery patients indicated outcomes of importance that are not addressed by more general instruments. Specifically, forefoot appearance and pain in other areas of the body are not addressed by commonly used instruments. In addition, patient experiences of pain are more granular and HR-specific than the generic pain items used by other instruments. Patients facing HR surgery may benefit from outcome measures that are more specific to the HR surgical experience and include outcomes that patients share are important to them that are not included in commonly used outcome instruments.
Authors
- William R. Ledoux (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-7714)
- Pamela S. Fairchild (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-3946)
- Bruce J. Sangeorzan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-2579)
- Sienna L. Williams
- Alison W. Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9059-3708)
- Jay L. Crary
- Daniel C. Norvell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-2677)
Institutions
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
- Rebound Orthopedics and Neurosurgery (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-09-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332385
- Primary Topic
- Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00