Impact of Professional Development on Ancillary Staff’s Knowledge and Confidence in Supporting Twice-Exceptional Students

In a large, urban US public school district that began a new identification system for gifted education focused on the equity and inclusion of twice-exceptional (2e) students, a need for the further training of educators involved with assessment, services, and planning with this unique group of students was warranted. After attending a professional learning (PL) event, 243 ancillary staff members (school psychologists, social workers, occupational and physical therapists, and speech/language pathologists) completed a survey with both closed- and open-ended responses. This study was guided by the research question: How does professional development on twice-exceptional (2e) students affect ancillary staff’s knowledge and confidence for supporting 2e students? The survey results provided valuable insights (themes) into participants’ perceptions of their understanding and ability to support 2e students after the PL session.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091220
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Professional Development on Ancillary Staff’s Knowledge and Confidence in Supporting Twice-Exceptional Students

Kelly C. Margot, Chandra B. Floyd, Do‐Hong Kim
Education Sciences
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
article

Impact of Professional Development on Ancillary Staff’s Knowledge and Confidence in Supporting Twice-Exceptional Students

Kelly C. Margot, Chandra B. Floyd, Do‐Hong Kim
article en

Abstract

In a large, urban US public school district that began a new identification system for gifted education focused on the equity and inclusion of twice-exceptional (2e) students, a need for the further training of educators involved with assessment, services, and planning with this unique group of students was warranted. After attending a professional learning (PL) event, 243 ancillary staff members (school psychologists, social workers, occupational and physical therapists, and speech/language pathologists) completed a survey with both closed- and open-ended responses. This study was guided by the research question: How does professional development on twice-exceptional (2e) students affect ancillary staff’s knowledge and confidence for supporting 2e students? The survey results provided valuable insights (themes) into participants’ perceptions of their understanding and ability to support 2e students after the PL session.

Education SciencesVol. 15(9)
William & Mary (US), Wayne State University (US), Grand Valley State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.