Validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness of the modified Iowa Level of Assistance (mILOA) for acutely hospitalised general medical patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Iowa Level of Assistance (mILOA) in general medical patients aged ≥65 years.DesignProspective observational psychometric measurement study.<b>Main outcome measures</b>: The mILOA was completed at hospital admission (<i>n = </i>246) and discharge (<i>n = </i>121). A second measure was completed within 24-h to establish inter-rater reliability and measurement error (<i>n = </i>50). Criterion predictive validity for discharge destination, floor and ceiling effects, responsiveness, and construct validity, via convergent validity (with the de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) and known group validity (discharge home), were assessed using standard psychometric techniques.ResultsThere were 246 included participants (median age = 83.2; interquartile range = 46.1-88.0 years; 47% female). The mILOA took a median of 12.5 [interquartile range = 8.0-18.0] minutes to complete. There were no systematic differences across the range of scores (mean difference = 1.1) with limits of agreement of 7.7 and -5.4 (variability due to measurement error = 2.36). It was able to predict discharge destination (area under the curve = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.66-0.81). No floor or ceiling effects were observed, and it was highly responsive to change (effect size = 0.80). Scores correlated significantly and positively with DEMMI scores (Spearman's rho = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.81-0.90, <i>p</i> < .001) and showed a median difference of 8 points between known groups.ConclusionThe mILOA has good inter-rater reliability, no floor or ceiling effects, strong responsiveness, high correlation with the DEMMI, and the ability to discriminate between known groups in older general medical patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251377219
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness of the modified Iowa Level of Assistance (mILOA) for acutely hospitalised general medical patients

Sze‐Ee Soh, Aruska N. D’Souza, Dina Pogrebnoy, Casey L. Peiris et al.
Clinical Rehabilitation
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Validity, inter-rater reliability and responsiveness of the modified Iowa Level of Assistance (mILOA) for acutely hospitalised general medical patients

Sze‐Ee Soh, Aruska N. D’Souza, Dina Pogrebnoy, Casey L. Peiris, Catherine M. Said, J. L. Cobbledick, Aisling Burke
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Iowa Level of Assistance (mILOA) in general medical patients aged ≥65 years.DesignProspective observational psychometric measurement study.<b>Main outcome measures</b>: The mILOA was completed at hospital admission (<i>n = </i>246) and discharge (<i>n = </i>121). A second measure was completed within 24-h to establish inter-rater reliability and measurement error (<i>n = </i>50). Criterion predictive validity for discharge destination, floor and ceiling effects, responsiveness, and construct validity, via convergent validity (with the de Morton Mobility Index, DEMMI) and known group validity (discharge home), were assessed using standard psychometric techniques.ResultsThere were 246 included participants (median age = 83.2; interquartile range = 46.1-88.0 years; 47% female). The mILOA took a median of 12.5 [interquartile range = 8.0-18.0] minutes to complete. There were no systematic differences across the range of scores (mean difference = 1.1) with limits of agreement of 7.7 and -5.4 (variability due to measurement error = 2.36). It was able to predict discharge destination (area under the curve = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.66-0.81). No floor or ceiling effects were observed, and it was highly responsive to change (effect size = 0.80). Scores correlated significantly and positively with DEMMI scores (Spearman's rho = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = 0.81-0.90, <i>p</i> < .001) and showed a median difference of 8 points between known groups.ConclusionThe mILOA has good inter-rater reliability, no floor or ceiling effects, strong responsiveness, high correlation with the DEMMI, and the ability to discriminate between known groups in older general medical patients.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(12)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Frankston Hospital (AU), Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AU), Sunshine Hospital (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.