Prioritizing Cloud Services Using Quality Function Deployment: A QoS-Centric Decision Framework

The proliferation of cloud service providers offering diverse Quality of Service (QoS) attributes has made the selection of optimal services a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem. Traditional approaches such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and utility-based models, though systematic, often lack transparency in linking user-defined requirements to technical service attributes. This paper presents a generalized framework for cloud service selection based on Quality Function Deployment (QFD), enabling an intuitive and structured translation of customer QoS requirements into technical evaluation criteria. The proposed model constructs a House of Quality (HoQ) to map key customer-centric attributes, such as performance, cost, availability, reliability, and security, to measurable technical metrics, including response time, throughput, scalability, and SLA violations. By assigning relational weights and computing technical priority scores, the framework facilitates the ranking of cloud service alternatives. A realistic case study involving multiple IaaS providers demonstrates the applicability and effectiveness of the QFD model. Comparative analysis against AHP-based rankings highlights the interpretability and user-aligned prioritization benefits of QFD. This work contributes to a reusable decision support methodology for QoS awareness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isac364032.2025.11156863
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing Cloud Services Using Quality Function Deployment: A QoS-Centric Decision Framework

Debendra Muduli, Rakesh Ranjan Kumar, Arup Kumar Harichandan
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

Prioritizing Cloud Services Using Quality Function Deployment: A QoS-Centric Decision Framework

Debendra Muduli, Rakesh Ranjan Kumar, Arup Kumar Harichandan
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of cloud service providers offering diverse Quality of Service (QoS) attributes has made the selection of optimal services a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem. Traditional approaches such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and utility-based models, though systematic, often lack transparency in linking user-defined requirements to technical service attributes. This paper presents a generalized framework for cloud service selection based on Quality Function Deployment (QFD), enabling an intuitive and structured translation of customer QoS requirements into technical evaluation criteria. The proposed model constructs a House of Quality (HoQ) to map key customer-centric attributes, such as performance, cost, availability, reliability, and security, to measurable technical metrics, including response time, throughput, scalability, and SLA violations. By assigning relational weights and computing technical priority scores, the framework facilitates the ranking of cloud service alternatives. A realistic case study involving multiple IaaS providers demonstrates the applicability and effectiveness of the QFD model. Comparative analysis against AHP-based rankings highlights the interpretability and user-aligned prioritization benefits of QFD. This work contributes to a reusable decision support methodology for QoS awareness.

Vivekananda Global University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.