The OPTIMICE Project: Optimising Translation Quality of Metadata in the Editorial Chain of Academic Journals

The OPTIMICE project has developed a method that combines neural machine translation and human post-editing to enhance the quality of article metadata when translating from French to English as part of the journal editorial process. In partnership with the LIDILE research unit, the PUR (a French publisher) and the MSHB (French Centre for Human Sciences), we comparatively assessed the quality of human and machine translations of the metadata of 32 articles using our proprietary quality assessment grid and professional translators. The aim was to precisely determine the qualitative elements and limitations of each output, and to design the most appropriate translation method. We then formulated recommendations for writing and translating metadata to complement guidelines for authors, and improve the acceptance, referencing and international visibility of papers in journals. The method was finally tested on 2021 issues of the 4 selected journals, focusing on history, archaeology, education and geography respectively. The objective is to develop a methodology that can be reproduced and transferred to other journals, languages and disciplinary fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Management
Published
2025-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v25i3.7803
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The OPTIMICE Project: Optimising Translation Quality of Metadata in the Editorial Chain of Academic Journals

Katell Hernández Morin, Franck Barbin
American Journal of Management
Translation Studies and Practices
article

The OPTIMICE Project: Optimising Translation Quality of Metadata in the Editorial Chain of Academic Journals

Katell Hernández Morin, Franck Barbin
article en

Abstract

The OPTIMICE project has developed a method that combines neural machine translation and human post-editing to enhance the quality of article metadata when translating from French to English as part of the journal editorial process. In partnership with the LIDILE research unit, the PUR (a French publisher) and the MSHB (French Centre for Human Sciences), we comparatively assessed the quality of human and machine translations of the metadata of 32 articles using our proprietary quality assessment grid and professional translators. The aim was to precisely determine the qualitative elements and limitations of each output, and to design the most appropriate translation method. We then formulated recommendations for writing and translating metadata to complement guidelines for authors, and improve the acceptance, referencing and international visibility of papers in journals. The method was finally tested on 2021 issues of the 4 selected journals, focusing on history, archaeology, education and geography respectively. The objective is to develop a methodology that can be reproduced and transferred to other journals, languages and disciplinary fields.

American Journal of ManagementVol. 25(3)
Université Rennes 2 (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.