(De)centralized Water Futures: Key Dimensions of Infrastructure, Governance, and Operations

Water system centralization and decentralization have variously been promoted as key to achieving household water security and Sustainable Development Goal 6.1. We argue that the lack of specificity with which scholars and practitioners use the terms centralization and decentralization limits our understanding of different water system configurations and their impacts. In this Primer, we provide a framework for thinking about levels of (de)centralization across three linked system dimensions: infrastructure, governance, and operations and maintenance. We encourage those analyzing water systems to characterize (de)centralization with respect to these multiple dimensions, as well as the system's broader political-economic and hydro-climatic contexts. Emphasizing the importance of delineating the scale of analysis, we highlight distinct system configurations and the prevalence of hybridity. Increased specificity about dimensions and scale can clarify how the character of, or changes to, a given system impact users, which is critical to assessing their implications for water security, sustainability, and equity. We conclude with recommendations for future research to analyze the opportunities and challenges associated with different water system configurations. This article is categorized under: Human Water > Water Governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70035
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(De)centralized Water Futures: Key Dimensions of Infrastructure, Governance, and Operations

Alida Cantor, Jenny Rempel, Alicia Dailey Cooperman, Amber Wutich et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

(De)centralized Water Futures: Key Dimensions of Infrastructure, Governance, and Operations

Alida Cantor, Jenny Rempel, Alicia Dailey Cooperman, Amber Wutich, Cassandra L. Workman, Linda Estelí Méndez‐Barrientos, Ellis Adjei Adams, Melissa Beresford, Nicole J. Wilson, Sameer H. Shah, Jeremiah Osborne‐Gowey, Justin Stoler, Manuela Muñoz, Leila M. Harris
article en

Abstract

Water system centralization and decentralization have variously been promoted as key to achieving household water security and Sustainable Development Goal 6.1. We argue that the lack of specificity with which scholars and practitioners use the terms centralization and decentralization limits our understanding of different water system configurations and their impacts. In this Primer, we provide a framework for thinking about levels of (de)centralization across three linked system dimensions: infrastructure, governance, and operations and maintenance. We encourage those analyzing water systems to characterize (de)centralization with respect to these multiple dimensions, as well as the system's broader political-economic and hydro-climatic contexts. Emphasizing the importance of delineating the scale of analysis, we highlight distinct system configurations and the prevalence of hybridity. Increased specificity about dimensions and scale can clarify how the character of, or changes to, a given system impact users, which is critical to assessing their implications for water security, sustainability, and equity. We conclude with recommendations for future research to analyze the opportunities and challenges associated with different water system configurations. This article is categorized under: Human Water > Water Governance.

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews WaterVol. 12(5)
University of Notre Dame (US), Texas Tech University (US), Portland State University (US), University of Denver (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Miami (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), George Washington University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Manitoba (CA), San Jose State University (US), Arizona State University (US), Texas A&M University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Canada Research Chairs, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.