Never-Ending Cycles of Collaborative Contracting Initiatives: Dynamics of Legitimacy in a Public Client Organization

Collaborative contracting models are increasingly being adopted for complex construction projects but achieving consistent improvement and broader alignment of such practices remains challenging. Based on a longitudinal study of collaborative contracting in Swedish infrastructure construction, this article argues that legitimacy concerns among major public sector clients contribute to this difficulty. Top management often responds to external criticism by quickly adopting new models, thus delegitimizing earlier practices and disrupting continuity at the operational level. Consequently, learning is cut short, and performance gains are unrealized—leading to repeated cycles of short-lived collaborative initiatives without sustained improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728251372844
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Never-Ending Cycles of Collaborative Contracting Initiatives: Dynamics of Legitimacy in a Public Client Organization

Lilly Rosander, Anna Kadefors, Per Erik Eriksson
1 citations
Project Management Journal
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
article

Never-Ending Cycles of Collaborative Contracting Initiatives: Dynamics of Legitimacy in a Public Client Organization

Lilly Rosander, Anna Kadefors, Per Erik Eriksson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Collaborative contracting models are increasingly being adopted for complex construction projects but achieving consistent improvement and broader alignment of such practices remains challenging. Based on a longitudinal study of collaborative contracting in Swedish infrastructure construction, this article argues that legitimacy concerns among major public sector clients contribute to this difficulty. Top management often responds to external criticism by quickly adopting new models, thus delegitimizing earlier practices and disrupting continuity at the operational level. Consequently, learning is cut short, and performance gains are unrealized—leading to repeated cycles of short-lived collaborative initiatives without sustained improvement.

Project Management JournalVol. 57(1)
Luleå University of Technology (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Trafikverket
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Public Procurement and Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Never-Ending Cycles of Collaborative Contracting Initiatives: Dynamics of Legitimacy in a Public Client Organization — Lilly Rosander, Anna Kadefors, et al. · Project Management Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS