Perceptions and challenges of AI-driven code reviews: A qualitative exploration of developer experiences

AI-driven code review tools represent transformative advances in software development, improving efficiency, productivity, and accuracy in code reviews.Despite these potential benefits, concerns about trust, reliability, and contextual comprehension persist, limiting their widespread adoption.This qualitative study examines the perceptions and challenges faced by software developers regarding AIdriven code review tools.Through semi-structured and thematic analysis involving software developers, technical leads, and architects, the study identifies central themes, including trust in AI-generated recommendations, the impact on developer productivity, ethical considerations, and the need for contextual awareness.While participants acknowledge the efficiency gains and educational value provided by AI tools, skepticism remains regarding the tools' ability to interpret complex business logic and domain-specific scenarios.Participants advocate for enhancements in AI-driven tools, highlighting the need for improved contextual awareness, transparency, ethical integration, and seamless workflow integration.This research adds valuable empirical insights to ongoing discussions in software engineering literature, emphasizing AI-driven code reviews as complementary tools that augment human expertise in software development processes.

Publication Details

Journal
Issues in Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_127
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and challenges of AI-driven code reviews: A qualitative exploration of developer experiences

Issues in Information Systems
Software Engineering Research
article

Perceptions and challenges of AI-driven code reviews: A qualitative exploration of developer experiences

article en

Abstract

AI-driven code review tools represent transformative advances in software development, improving efficiency, productivity, and accuracy in code reviews.Despite these potential benefits, concerns about trust, reliability, and contextual comprehension persist, limiting their widespread adoption.This qualitative study examines the perceptions and challenges faced by software developers regarding AIdriven code review tools.Through semi-structured and thematic analysis involving software developers, technical leads, and architects, the study identifies central themes, including trust in AI-generated recommendations, the impact on developer productivity, ethical considerations, and the need for contextual awareness.While participants acknowledge the efficiency gains and educational value provided by AI tools, skepticism remains regarding the tools' ability to interpret complex business logic and domain-specific scenarios.Participants advocate for enhancements in AI-driven tools, highlighting the need for improved contextual awareness, transparency, ethical integration, and seamless workflow integration.This research adds valuable empirical insights to ongoing discussions in software engineering literature, emphasizing AI-driven code reviews as complementary tools that augment human expertise in software development processes.

Issues in Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceptions and challenges of AI-driven code reviews: A qualitative exploration of developer experiences · Issues in Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS