Generative AI in higher education: student and faculty perspectives on use, ethics, and impact?

This study investigates how generative AI tools are shaping the academic experiences of college students and faculty.Using a mixed-methods approach, the research draws on survey data from 114 students and interviews with 18 professors to explore perceptions, usage patterns, and perceived academic impacts of generative AI in coursework.Findings indicate that students generally view generative AI positively, particularly as a tool for managing academic stress and enhancing learning, with usage most common among those juggling multiple responsibilities.In contrast, faculty opinions were more cautious, emphasizing ethical concerns and inconsistent policy enforcement.Cultural background significantly influenced student attitudes; Asian-raised students reported more favorable views than North Americanraised peers, while factors like gender and academic performance showed minimal effect.Faculty interviews revealed that most instructors permit AI use under certain conditions but lack formalized policies.The study highlights a growing disconnect between student behavior and institutional readiness, calling for clear, adaptable AI guidelines that balance academic integrity with practical student needs.These findings offer timely insights to help universities create effective and equitable AI integration strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
Issues in Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_129
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in higher education: student and faculty perspectives on use, ethics, and impact?

Issues in Information Systems
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI in higher education: student and faculty perspectives on use, ethics, and impact?

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how generative AI tools are shaping the academic experiences of college students and faculty.Using a mixed-methods approach, the research draws on survey data from 114 students and interviews with 18 professors to explore perceptions, usage patterns, and perceived academic impacts of generative AI in coursework.Findings indicate that students generally view generative AI positively, particularly as a tool for managing academic stress and enhancing learning, with usage most common among those juggling multiple responsibilities.In contrast, faculty opinions were more cautious, emphasizing ethical concerns and inconsistent policy enforcement.Cultural background significantly influenced student attitudes; Asian-raised students reported more favorable views than North Americanraised peers, while factors like gender and academic performance showed minimal effect.Faculty interviews revealed that most instructors permit AI use under certain conditions but lack formalized policies.The study highlights a growing disconnect between student behavior and institutional readiness, calling for clear, adaptable AI guidelines that balance academic integrity with practical student needs.These findings offer timely insights to help universities create effective and equitable AI integration strategies.

Issues in Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI in higher education: student and faculty perspectives on use, ethics, and impact? · Issues in Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS