<i>Necroaccountability</i> , epidemics and symbolic power: A comparison between London and Naples in 1854

This study compares the systems of accounts of death operating in London and Naples during the cholera epidemic of 1854. It adopts a translation in space and time of the Bourdieusian concepts of field, capital and habitus and analyses secondary sources as well as primary sources, mainly in the form of medical reports, bulletins, records and healthcare registers retained in the State Archive of Naples and the National Archives in London. The main finding is that the significance of providing an account of death is a function of the distributions and intensity of the symbolic power in the field of forces where it occurs. Moreover, rendering accounts of death reinforces the initial state of equilibrium or disequilibrium within the field. The article contributes to the emerging streams of research into necroaccountability and into natural disasters in the form of epidemics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting History
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732251371328
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Necroaccountability , epidemics and symbolic power: A comparison between London and Naples in 1854

Alisdair Dobie, Tiziana Di Cimbrini, Alessio Maria Musella
Accounting History
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Necroaccountability , epidemics and symbolic power: A comparison between London and Naples in 1854

Alisdair Dobie, Tiziana Di Cimbrini, Alessio Maria Musella
article en

Abstract

This study compares the systems of accounts of death operating in London and Naples during the cholera epidemic of 1854. It adopts a translation in space and time of the Bourdieusian concepts of field, capital and habitus and analyses secondary sources as well as primary sources, mainly in the form of medical reports, bulletins, records and healthcare registers retained in the State Archive of Naples and the National Archives in London. The main finding is that the significance of providing an account of death is a function of the distributions and intensity of the symbolic power in the field of forces where it occurs. Moreover, rendering accounts of death reinforces the initial state of equilibrium or disequilibrium within the field. The article contributes to the emerging streams of research into necroaccountability and into natural disasters in the form of epidemics.

Accounting HistoryVol. 31(1)
University of Teramo (IT), Edge Hill University (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>Necroaccountability</i> , epidemics and symbolic power: A comparison between London and Naples in 1854 — Alisdair Dobie, Tiziana Di Cimbrini, et al. · Accounting History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS