Für eine Wohnungsbaudebatte, die Flächen dort sucht, wo sie gebraucht werden. Ein Kommentar zur InWIS-Studie „Wohnungsbau braucht (mehr) Fläche“

This commentary addresses the findings of the study “Housing Construction Needs (More) Land: New Land Take and Infill Development Under Scrutiny”, published by Institute for Housing, Real Estate, Urban and Regional Development (InWIS) at the Ruhr University Bochum und der EBZ Business School Bochum on June 18, 2025. The study concludes that due to barriers to infill development, new land is required for housing construction, and that the 30-hectare land-saving target should be questioned. In our view, this blanket demand is misleading and steers the debate in the wrong direction. Our micro-level empirical evidence shows that housing demand is highly concentrated in growth centres and transport corridors, while other areas are stagnating. A blanket release of land would therefore fuel uncontrolled urban sprawl. Instead of short-sighted instruments, we call for a sustainable housing policy based on a valid, small-scale database. The challenges are local, but the solutions must be conceived regionally and organized cooperatively. We advocate for a planning culture that strengthens regional responsibility and manages development according to actual needs, instead of abandoning land conservation across the board.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and Planning
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.3425
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Für eine Wohnungsbaudebatte, die Flächen dort sucht, wo sie gebraucht werden. Ein Kommentar zur InWIS-Studie „Wohnungsbau braucht (mehr) Fläche“

Angelika Münter, Sebastian Eichhorn, Mathias Jehling, Thomas G. Preuß et al.
Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and Planning
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Für eine Wohnungsbaudebatte, die Flächen dort sucht, wo sie gebraucht werden. Ein Kommentar zur InWIS-Studie „Wohnungsbau braucht (mehr) Fläche“

Angelika Münter, Sebastian Eichhorn, Mathias Jehling, Thomas G. Preuß, Maic Verbücheln, Ricarda Pätzold, Christian Holl
article en

Abstract

This commentary addresses the findings of the study “Housing Construction Needs (More) Land: New Land Take and Infill Development Under Scrutiny”, published by Institute for Housing, Real Estate, Urban and Regional Development (InWIS) at the Ruhr University Bochum und der EBZ Business School Bochum on June 18, 2025. The study concludes that due to barriers to infill development, new land is required for housing construction, and that the 30-hectare land-saving target should be questioned. In our view, this blanket demand is misleading and steers the debate in the wrong direction. Our micro-level empirical evidence shows that housing demand is highly concentrated in growth centres and transport corridors, while other areas are stagnating. A blanket release of land would therefore fuel uncontrolled urban sprawl. Instead of short-sighted instruments, we call for a sustainable housing policy based on a valid, small-scale database. The challenges are local, but the solutions must be conceived regionally and organized cooperatively. We advocate for a planning culture that strengthens regional responsibility and manages development according to actual needs, instead of abandoning land conservation across the board.

Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and PlanningVol. 83(5)
ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development (DE), Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (DE), Leibniz Publik (DE), Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.