Occipital versus Non-Occipital Migraine Pain: Clinical Characteristics, Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Response, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological Perspectives

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses in patients with migraine with occipital pain and those with non-occipital pain. We hypothesized that the area of pain could influence clinical features and treatment responses. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine who attended a Neurology (Headache) outpatient clinic between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (People with migraine with occipital pain) and Group 2 (People with migraine with non-occipital pain). Data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical features, and treatment responses. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 50 included in Group 1 [39 patients (78%) with episodic migraine; 40 (80%) females], and 50 patients included in Group 2 [40 patients (80%) with episodic migraine; 43 (86%) females]. No significant difference was found in gender distribution (p=0.603), age of migraine onset (p=0.904), or time until diagnosis (p=0.205). Group 1 had more frequent bilateral pain (50% vs 38%, p=0.003) and a higher mean of migraine days per month (11 vs 6, p=0.004). Similar proportions of patients started oral preventive treatment (70% vs 80%, p=0.248). In Group 1, the most prescribed drug was amitriptyline, while in Group 2, it was topiramate. Group 1 had higher treatment failure rates than Group 2 (70% vs 31%, p<0.001). After adjusting for monthly migraine frequency, occipital pain remained independently associated with a poorer response to preventive treatment (adjusted OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.14–0.77; p=0.01). Conclusion: Patients with occipital migraine experience more bilateral pain, migraine frequency, and higher treatment failure rates. These findings suggest the need for tailored treatment strategies based on migraine pain localization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sinapse
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/ao/157/2025
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occipital versus Non-Occipital Migraine Pain: Clinical Characteristics, Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Response, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological Perspectives

Miguel Serôdio, Carolina Gonçalves, Gonçalo Cabral, Rita Pelejão
Sinapse
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Occipital versus Non-Occipital Migraine Pain: Clinical Characteristics, Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Response, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological Perspectives

Miguel Serôdio, Carolina Gonçalves, Gonçalo Cabral, Rita Pelejão
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses in patients with migraine with occipital pain and those with non-occipital pain. We hypothesized that the area of pain could influence clinical features and treatment responses. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine who attended a Neurology (Headache) outpatient clinic between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (People with migraine with occipital pain) and Group 2 (People with migraine with non-occipital pain). Data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical features, and treatment responses. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 50 included in Group 1 [39 patients (78%) with episodic migraine; 40 (80%) females], and 50 patients included in Group 2 [40 patients (80%) with episodic migraine; 43 (86%) females]. No significant difference was found in gender distribution (p=0.603), age of migraine onset (p=0.904), or time until diagnosis (p=0.205). Group 1 had more frequent bilateral pain (50% vs 38%, p=0.003) and a higher mean of migraine days per month (11 vs 6, p=0.004). Similar proportions of patients started oral preventive treatment (70% vs 80%, p=0.248). In Group 1, the most prescribed drug was amitriptyline, while in Group 2, it was topiramate. Group 1 had higher treatment failure rates than Group 2 (70% vs 31%, p<0.001). After adjusting for monthly migraine frequency, occipital pain remained independently associated with a poorer response to preventive treatment (adjusted OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.14–0.77; p=0.01). Conclusion: Patients with occipital migraine experience more bilateral pain, migraine frequency, and higher treatment failure rates. These findings suggest the need for tailored treatment strategies based on migraine pain localization.

SinapseVol. 25(3)
Hospital de Egas Moniz (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.