LEBANESE "CONSOCIAL DEMOCRACY" IN A REGIONAL CONTEXT

The article examines Lebanese “consociual democracy” in a regional context. The author provides a brief characterization of the main conceptual approaches to “consensual democracy.” Particular attention is paid to the changes that have occurred in Lebanese politics in recent decades. In order to understand the main thrust of the article, it is necessary to look at consensual democracy. Consocial democracy is understood as a form of democratic governance designed to stabilize deeply divided societies, especially those divided along ethnic, religious, linguistic, or ideological lines, by ensuring the sharing of power among major social groups. The concept of the theory was most fully developed by political scientist Arend Lijphart, who argued that such systems can provide stability in majority societies that would otherwise be prone to conflict. The main features of consocial democracy are as follows: Grand Coalition: Leaders of all significant segments of society (e.g., political, religious, or ethnic groups) share power in a broad coalition government. Mutual Veto: Each group has the right to veto decisions that affect its vital interests, providing a safeguard against majority rule. Proportionality: Representation and resource allocation in political institutions (parliament, civil service, etc.) are proportional to the population of each group.