Prevalence of Decreased Bowel Movements in Tracheostomy Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Tracheostomy alters laryngeal mechanics and may impair the Valsalva manoeuvre, predisposing patients to decreased bowel movements and constipation. Evidence on constipation using the Rome IV criteria in adult tracheostomy patients is limited. Objective: To determine the prevalence of Rome IV–defined constipation and describe bowel symptoms among adult tracheostomy patients in a tertiary-care setting. Methods: This single-centre prospective study enrolled consecutive adults (≥18 years) who underwent tracheostomy at the Otorhinolaryngology Department, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to May 2025. Patients had a tracheostomy in place for≥30 days; those with prior gastrointestinal disorders, constipation secondary to medications, current laxative use, or ICU/vegetative state were excluded. Participants completed a questionnaire at 1-month follow-up, capturing demographics and Rome IV items. Categorical variables were compared with Chi-square tests and continuous variables with independent-samples t-tests (α=0.05). Results: Ninety-five patients were included (mean age 51.9 ± 15.6 years; 78.9% male). Prior constipation was reported by 3.2% (n=3); none were on constipation medications, and none had colon or neurological disease. Overall, 91.5% reported hard stools in the prior two weeks; 57.9% had hard stools in ≥50% of defecations; 71.6% strained in >25% of defecations; 29.4% reported incomplete evacuation in >25%; 29.5% experienced anorectal obstruction in 25%; 11.6% required manual evacuation; and 86.3% had <3 Spontaneous bowel movements/week. Rome IV constipation prevalence was 71.6% (68/95). Compared with non-constipated patients, the constipated group more often had hard stools ≥50% (100% vs 0%), straining >25% (100% vs 0%), anorectal obstruction 25% (41.2% vs 0%), manual evacuation (16.2% vs 0%), and precisely two bowel movements/week (95.6% vs 51.9%) (all p<0.001 except manual evacuation p=0.030). Age did not differ significantly (51.1 ± 15.7 vs 53.9 ± 15.4 years; p=0.439). Conclusions: Constipation by Rome IV criteria is highly prevalent (72%) one month after tracheostomy in this tertiary-care cohort, despite minimal prior diagnoses. Routine screening and early bowel regimens (including hydration, fibre, mobilization, and laxatives as indicated) should be integrated into post-tracheostomy care pathways. Multicentre, longer-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings and identify modifiable risk factors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1946
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Decreased Bowel Movements in Tracheostomy Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Aiza Jamil, Md. Abdus Shahid, Syed Qasim Hashmi, Hisham Rashid et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Prevalence of Decreased Bowel Movements in Tracheostomy Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Aiza Jamil, Md. Abdus Shahid, Syed Qasim Hashmi, Hisham Rashid, Sadaf Zia, S. Naeem
article en

Abstract

Tracheostomy alters laryngeal mechanics and may impair the Valsalva manoeuvre, predisposing patients to decreased bowel movements and constipation. Evidence on constipation using the Rome IV criteria in adult tracheostomy patients is limited. Objective: To determine the prevalence of Rome IV–defined constipation and describe bowel symptoms among adult tracheostomy patients in a tertiary-care setting. Methods: This single-centre prospective study enrolled consecutive adults (≥18 years) who underwent tracheostomy at the Otorhinolaryngology Department, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from March to May 2025. Patients had a tracheostomy in place for≥30 days; those with prior gastrointestinal disorders, constipation secondary to medications, current laxative use, or ICU/vegetative state were excluded. Participants completed a questionnaire at 1-month follow-up, capturing demographics and Rome IV items. Categorical variables were compared with Chi-square tests and continuous variables with independent-samples t-tests (α=0.05). Results: Ninety-five patients were included (mean age 51.9 ± 15.6 years; 78.9% male). Prior constipation was reported by 3.2% (n=3); none were on constipation medications, and none had colon or neurological disease. Overall, 91.5% reported hard stools in the prior two weeks; 57.9% had hard stools in ≥50% of defecations; 71.6% strained in >25% of defecations; 29.4% reported incomplete evacuation in >25%; 29.5% experienced anorectal obstruction in 25%; 11.6% required manual evacuation; and 86.3% had <3 Spontaneous bowel movements/week. Rome IV constipation prevalence was 71.6% (68/95). Compared with non-constipated patients, the constipated group more often had hard stools ≥50% (100% vs 0%), straining >25% (100% vs 0%), anorectal obstruction 25% (41.2% vs 0%), manual evacuation (16.2% vs 0%), and precisely two bowel movements/week (95.6% vs 51.9%) (all p<0.001 except manual evacuation p=0.030). Age did not differ significantly (51.1 ± 15.7 vs 53.9 ± 15.4 years; p=0.439). Conclusions: Constipation by Rome IV criteria is highly prevalent (72%) one month after tracheostomy in this tertiary-care cohort, despite minimal prior diagnoses. Routine screening and early bowel regimens (including hydration, fibre, mobilization, and laxatives as indicated) should be integrated into post-tracheostomy care pathways. Multicentre, longer-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings and identify modifiable risk factors.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.