Reply to Quillien: Intuitive preferences and interpretive humility in intentionality judgments

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2518353122
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reply to Quillien: Intuitive preferences and interpretive humility in intentionality judgments

Will M. Gervais, Gordon Pennycook, Ryan McKay, Jonathan A. Lanman et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Reply to Quillien: Intuitive preferences and interpretive humility in intentionality judgments

Will M. Gervais, Gordon Pennycook, Ryan McKay, Jonathan A. Lanman, Robert M. Ross, Jazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi, Jonathan Jong
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(38)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Cornell University (US), University of Virginia (US), Brunel University of London (GB), Coventry University (GB), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.