The power of bridging decision scales: Model coupling for advanced climate policy analysis

Climate policy faces increasingly complex challenges that span multiple human decision scales in nature-society systems. Contemporary climate policy models, while valuable and increasingly versatile in handling spatial and temporal scales, struggle to capture interacting multiscale decisions on the socioeconomic side. This perspective draws attention to the power of coupling among different modeling families, taking integrated assessment models (IAM), computable general equilibrium models (CGE), and agent-based models (ABM) as examples. Recent computational advances, maturity of models, availability of data, and interdisciplinary expertise make model coupling an increasingly feasible, effective, and useful tool for climate policy analysis. We examine the unique contributions of each modeling approach, highlight synergies from uniting their strengths, and discuss alternatives to and conditions for coupling. In addressing methodological challenges, we present examples of effective coupling of IAM-ABM-CGE, emphasizing the importance of maintaining model integrity while enhancing policy relevance. By bridging human decision scales and leveraging complementary strengths, coupled models can provide nuanced insights into climate-economy interactions, ultimately supporting effective and equitable-not just efficient and optimal-climate policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411592122
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power of bridging decision scales: Model coupling for advanced climate policy analysis

Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld, Anton Pichler, Theodoros Chatzivasileiadis, Tatiana Filatova et al.
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Climate Change Policy and Economics
21.92
article

The power of bridging decision scales: Model coupling for advanced climate policy analysis

Mariësse A.E. van Sluisveld, Anton Pichler, Theodoros Chatzivasileiadis, Tatiana Filatova, Nicholas R. Magliocca, L. A. M. Verbeek, Alessandro Taberna, Stefan Nabernegg, Taoyuan Wei, Francesco Lamperti, Giacomo Marangoni, Jan Kwakkel, Nina Knittel, Karolina Safarzyńska, Amineh Ghorbani, Francesco Bosello, Ignasi Cortés Arbués, Joos Akkerman, Olga Ivanova, Adrian Poujon
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Climate policy faces increasingly complex challenges that span multiple human decision scales in nature-society systems. Contemporary climate policy models, while valuable and increasingly versatile in handling spatial and temporal scales, struggle to capture interacting multiscale decisions on the socioeconomic side. This perspective draws attention to the power of coupling among different modeling families, taking integrated assessment models (IAM), computable general equilibrium models (CGE), and agent-based models (ABM) as examples. Recent computational advances, maturity of models, availability of data, and interdisciplinary expertise make model coupling an increasingly feasible, effective, and useful tool for climate policy analysis. We examine the unique contributions of each modeling approach, highlight synergies from uniting their strengths, and discuss alternatives to and conditions for coupling. In addressing methodological challenges, we present examples of effective coupling of IAM-ABM-CGE, emphasizing the importance of maintaining model integrity while enhancing policy relevance. By bridging human decision scales and leveraging complementary strengths, coupled models can provide nuanced insights into climate-economy interactions, ultimately supporting effective and equitable-not just efficient and optimal-climate policies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(38)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Ministry of Economy (MK), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), University of Alabama (US), Center for Social and Economic Research (PL), SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL), Committee on Climate Change (GB), RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (IT), Complexity Science Hub (AT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Klima- und Energiefonds, European Commission, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.