Ethical Leadership for Online Special Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis & Construct Validation of a New Measure

This study proposes that special education teachers’ perceptions of psychological empowerment serve as a meaningful indicator of school administrators’ ethical leadership. The Perceptions of Ethical Leadership for Special Education (PELSE) survey instrument was developed to assess this construct, incorporating validated measures of procedural justice and psychological empowerment. Employing a quantitative observational methodology, the study examined responses from 488 special education teachers assigned to online teaching at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Internal consistency reliability for the PELSE was confirmed (α = .76). Findings are interpreted through a retrospective lens, highlighting how ethical leadership was perceived during a period when the U.S. Department of Education reinforced the mandate for continued compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. The study presents the PELSE as a replicable tool with relevance for pre-service leadership preparation, in-service administrator reflection, and future empirical inquiry into ethical leadership within special education contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Educational Management
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.8.3.151
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Leadership for Online Special Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis & Construct Validation of a New Measure

John M. Palladino, Olivia Chandler
European Journal of Educational Management
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Ethical Leadership for Online Special Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis & Construct Validation of a New Measure

John M. Palladino, Olivia Chandler
article en

Abstract

This study proposes that special education teachers’ perceptions of psychological empowerment serve as a meaningful indicator of school administrators’ ethical leadership. The Perceptions of Ethical Leadership for Special Education (PELSE) survey instrument was developed to assess this construct, incorporating validated measures of procedural justice and psychological empowerment. Employing a quantitative observational methodology, the study examined responses from 488 special education teachers assigned to online teaching at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Internal consistency reliability for the PELSE was confirmed (α = .76). Findings are interpreted through a retrospective lens, highlighting how ethical leadership was perceived during a period when the U.S. Department of Education reinforced the mandate for continued compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. The study presents the PELSE as a replicable tool with relevance for pre-service leadership preparation, in-service administrator reflection, and future empirical inquiry into ethical leadership within special education contexts.

European Journal of Educational ManagementVol. 8(3)
Eastern Michigan University (US)
Eastern Michigan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical Leadership for Online Special Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis & Construct Validation of a New Measure — John M. Palladino, Olivia Chandler · European Journal of Educational Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS