Bootstrap confidence intervals to assess risk factors for early postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery

Importance. Early postoperative pulmonary complications (EPPCs) after abdominal surgery increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Objective. This study aimed to identify risk factors for EPPCs using only easily collected clinical data from a local population. Design, Setting, and Population From December 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, a singlecenter, prospective cohort study was conducted at Batna University Hospital in Algeria. Adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled, and ten preoperative parameters were analyzed. Exposures. Advanced age over 50, previous laparotomy, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, uncontrolled diabetes, urgent surgery, chronic corticosteroid use, active smoking, unbalanced diabetes, a preoperative stay of ≥3 days, obesity, and preoperative blood transfusions. Main Outcomes and Measures The crude associations between EPPCs and ten preoperative factors were assessed using univariate analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided pvalue < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals excluding 1. After dichotomizing all variables, associations were tested by the chi-square test, and bootstrap methods were applied to estimate 95% confidence intervals for the odds ratios. Results. Of 1,058 eligible patients, 741 were included, with 49 (6.6%) developing EPPCs. Among them, 20.4% had ARDS, 44.9% had pulmonary infections, and 34.7% experienced lung collapse. Half of the EPPCs cases had additional complications, mainly surgical site infections, with one EPPCrelated death. Univariate analysis identified eight significant risk factors: age ≥50 (OR 4.9), anterior laparotomy (OR 3.8), COPD (OR 7.5), preoperative stay ≥3 days (OR 3.6), unbalanced diabetes (OR 4), obesity (OR 2.7), active smoking (OR 3.3), and perioperative transfusion (OR 2.6) (all p < 0.05). The bootstrap confidence intervals showed that only six factors were significantly associated. Conclusions and Relevance. This study applied bootstrap techniques that produced stable estimates with low bias, thus strengthening the validity of the observed associations and the reliability of the inferences. Although some of the identified factors can be modified in elective surgeries, such adjustments are generally not feasible during emergency procedures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Batna Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48087/bjmsoa.2025.12308
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bootstrap confidence intervals to assess risk factors for early postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery

Abdelkrim ANOU, Sonia MEDAREGNAROU BOUBIR
Batna Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Bootstrap confidence intervals to assess risk factors for early postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery

Abdelkrim ANOU, Sonia MEDAREGNAROU BOUBIR
article en

Abstract

Importance. Early postoperative pulmonary complications (EPPCs) after abdominal surgery increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Objective. This study aimed to identify risk factors for EPPCs using only easily collected clinical data from a local population. Design, Setting, and Population From December 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, a singlecenter, prospective cohort study was conducted at Batna University Hospital in Algeria. Adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled, and ten preoperative parameters were analyzed. Exposures. Advanced age over 50, previous laparotomy, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, uncontrolled diabetes, urgent surgery, chronic corticosteroid use, active smoking, unbalanced diabetes, a preoperative stay of ≥3 days, obesity, and preoperative blood transfusions. Main Outcomes and Measures The crude associations between EPPCs and ten preoperative factors were assessed using univariate analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided pvalue < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals excluding 1. After dichotomizing all variables, associations were tested by the chi-square test, and bootstrap methods were applied to estimate 95% confidence intervals for the odds ratios. Results. Of 1,058 eligible patients, 741 were included, with 49 (6.6%) developing EPPCs. Among them, 20.4% had ARDS, 44.9% had pulmonary infections, and 34.7% experienced lung collapse. Half of the EPPCs cases had additional complications, mainly surgical site infections, with one EPPCrelated death. Univariate analysis identified eight significant risk factors: age ≥50 (OR 4.9), anterior laparotomy (OR 3.8), COPD (OR 7.5), preoperative stay ≥3 days (OR 3.6), unbalanced diabetes (OR 4), obesity (OR 2.7), active smoking (OR 3.3), and perioperative transfusion (OR 2.6) (all p < 0.05). The bootstrap confidence intervals showed that only six factors were significantly associated. Conclusions and Relevance. This study applied bootstrap techniques that produced stable estimates with low bias, thus strengthening the validity of the observed associations and the reliability of the inferences. Although some of the identified factors can be modified in elective surgeries, such adjustments are generally not feasible during emergency procedures.

Batna Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)Vol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.