Sample Size and Assessment Length Recommendations for the Diagnostic Status Facet Model

This study investigates the sample size and assessment length requirements of the recently proposed Diagnostic Facet Status Model (DFSM), a polytomous cognitive diagnostic model designed to simultaneously capture goal and intermediate understandings. While prior research established the model using a large sample (N = 4,000) and a long assessment (27 items), practical applications require guidance on whether DFSM can be reliably used with fewer students and shorter assessments. A fully crossed Monte Carlo simulation varying sample sizes (N = 250, 500, 1,000, 4,000) and assessment lengths (J = 9, 18, 27) was conducted where we evaluated item parameter, facet structure, and student latent profile recovery. Results showed that assessment length most strongly influenced item parameter recovery, with at least 18 items necessary to obtain unbiased estimates even for small samples. In contrast, facet sparsity and profile recovery were more sensitive to sample size, requiring at least 500 students for accurate estimation. We provide recommendations for assessment developers and educators on using DFSM in applied contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zr3je_v1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sample Size and Assessment Length Recommendations for the Diagnostic Status Facet Model

Ren He, Yale Quan
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Sample Size and Assessment Length Recommendations for the Diagnostic Status Facet Model

Ren He, Yale Quan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the sample size and assessment length requirements of the recently proposed Diagnostic Facet Status Model (DFSM), a polytomous cognitive diagnostic model designed to simultaneously capture goal and intermediate understandings. While prior research established the model using a large sample (N = 4,000) and a long assessment (27 items), practical applications require guidance on whether DFSM can be reliably used with fewer students and shorter assessments. A fully crossed Monte Carlo simulation varying sample sizes (N = 250, 500, 1,000, 4,000) and assessment lengths (J = 9, 18, 27) was conducted where we evaluated item parameter, facet structure, and student latent profile recovery. Results showed that assessment length most strongly influenced item parameter recovery, with at least 18 items necessary to obtain unbiased estimates even for small samples. In contrast, facet sparsity and profile recovery were more sensitive to sample size, requiring at least 500 students for accurate estimation. We provide recommendations for assessment developers and educators on using DFSM in applied contexts.

University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.