Text Psychometrics: Assessing Psychological Constructs in Text Using Natural Language Processing

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP). Yet when used to assess psychological constructs in text, they are generally not evaluated for the types of validity, reliability, and standardization typically expected from traditional questionnaires with rating scales. This study bridges that gap by demonstrating how to evaluate the psychometric properties of text-based models, which we call Text Psychometrics.We first review different NLP methods, compare their ability to address key challenges in psychological research such as explainability, and outline methods for evaluating them on many desirable psychometric properties. We then demonstrate this through two empirical studies. Study 1 classifies thousands of crisis counseling conversations and Reddit posts into different types of mental health issues and introduces a novel method to evaluate text models for content validity —the extent to which a test captures the full range of expressions of a construct. Study 2 examines prospective criterion validity by estimating how 49 known suicide risk factors predict imminent risk in crisis counseling conversations.In sum, NLP studies in psychology often rely on only a few validation metrics; here, we demonstrate the need for broader psychometric evaluation and provide a practical blueprint and future directions for achieving it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9rdux_v4
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Text Psychometrics: Assessing Psychological Constructs in Text Using Natural Language Processing

Daniel M. Low, Patrick Mair, Matthew K. Nock, Satrajit Ghosh
Mental Health via Writing
article

Text Psychometrics: Assessing Psychological Constructs in Text Using Natural Language Processing

Daniel M. Low, Patrick Mair, Matthew K. Nock, Satrajit Ghosh
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP). Yet when used to assess psychological constructs in text, they are generally not evaluated for the types of validity, reliability, and standardization typically expected from traditional questionnaires with rating scales. This study bridges that gap by demonstrating how to evaluate the psychometric properties of text-based models, which we call Text Psychometrics.We first review different NLP methods, compare their ability to address key challenges in psychological research such as explainability, and outline methods for evaluating them on many desirable psychometric properties. We then demonstrate this through two empirical studies. Study 1 classifies thousands of crisis counseling conversations and Reddit posts into different types of mental health issues and introduces a novel method to evaluate text models for content validity —the extent to which a test captures the full range of expressions of a construct. Study 2 examines prospective criterion validity by estimating how 49 known suicide risk factors predict imminent risk in crisis counseling conversations.In sum, NLP studies in psychology often rely on only a few validation metrics; here, we demonstrate the need for broader psychometric evaluation and provide a practical blueprint and future directions for achieving it.

Harvard University Press (US)
McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.