Feedback Mechanisms in Pronunciation and Speech Coaching Apps

This paper investigates the feedback mechanisms employed in English pronunciation and speech coaching (PSC) apps. An initial qualitative analysis looked at the pronunciation affordances of 42 apps and the modalities of their feedback. This informed the structuring of the subsequent quantitative analysis (and development of our publicly available App Search Engine). Though the examined apps employ a range of feedback strategies, they predominantly offer non-actionable feedback (e.g., binary, scale-based, raw numeric) primarily directed at segmental targets. Gap analysis reveals that a number of promising feedback strategies remain underrepresented in the current landscape. We briefly discuss ways in which developers, educators, and researchers might contribute to bettering the current approach to providing feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31274/psllt.18444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feedback Mechanisms in Pronunciation and Speech Coaching Apps

Beata Walesiak, Jim Talley
1 citations
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
article

Feedback Mechanisms in Pronunciation and Speech Coaching Apps

Beata Walesiak, Jim Talley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the feedback mechanisms employed in English pronunciation and speech coaching (PSC) apps. An initial qualitative analysis looked at the pronunciation affordances of 42 apps and the modalities of their feedback. This informed the structuring of the subsequent quantitative analysis (and development of our publicly available App Search Engine). Though the examined apps employ a range of feedback strategies, they predominantly offer non-actionable feedback (e.g., binary, scale-based, raw numeric) primarily directed at segmental targets. Gap analysis reveals that a number of promising feedback strategies remain underrepresented in the current landscape. We briefly discuss ways in which developers, educators, and researchers might contribute to bettering the current approach to providing feedback.

Institute of Linguistic Studies (RU), University of Warsaw (PL), Moscow State Linguistic University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.