Clinical efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and safety of tunnel-less versus single-tunnel suspension fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation: A retrospective comparative study

This study aims to compare clinical efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and safety of tunnel-less and single-tunnel suspension fixation for acromioclavicular joint separation. From January 2019 to June 2023, 45 patients with acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint separations were retrospectively analyzed. Cases were divided into coracoid single-tunnel fixation (n = 21) and tunnel-less suspension fixation (n = 24) groups. Open surgical techniques were used in both groups. Operative time, incision length, blood loss, Constant-Murley scores, pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and coracoclavicular (CC) distance were compared at preoperative, immediate postoperative (for CC distance), 3-month, and final follow-up (mean 9.1 months). Complications were evaluated. The tunnel-less group had shorter operative times (46.76 ± 5.01 vs 64.70 ± 5.72 minutes, P < .001) but similar blood loss and incision lengths (P > .05). Preoperative CC distances were similar. Postoperatively, both groups achieved significant reduction (single-tunnel: 9.7 ± 1.1 mm; tunnel-less: 9.4 ± 0.9 mm, P = .287). At final follow-up, CC distances were 11.6 ± 2.5 mm and 10.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively (P = .068). At 3 months, Constant-Murley scores were higher in the tunnel-less group (85.80 ± 2.22 vs 84.70 ± 1.75, P = .008), though differences in visual analog scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons were nonsignificant. No clinically significant differences in functional scores were observed at final follow-up. One coracoid fracture and 1 re-dislocation occurred in the single-tunnel group; no intraoperative or major postoperative complications occurred in the tunnel-less group. Both techniques achieved reliable fixation and functional recovery. Tunnel-less fixation required shorter operative time, avoided coracoid tunneling, and demonstrated a superior safety profile by reducing iatrogenic fracture risk and showing a trend towards better maintenance of radiographic reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000044310
Primary Topic
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and safety of tunnel-less versus single-tunnel suspension fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation: A retrospective comparative study

Jiang Yu, Jing Guangwu, Jie Tong, Kai Yang et al.
Medicine
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
article

Clinical efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and safety of tunnel-less versus single-tunnel suspension fixation in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation: A retrospective comparative study

Jiang Yu, Jing Guangwu, Jie Tong, Kai Yang, Chengjin Li, Guohai Ren, Nannan Zhang, Abdullah Ribeir Abdullah
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare clinical efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and safety of tunnel-less and single-tunnel suspension fixation for acromioclavicular joint separation. From January 2019 to June 2023, 45 patients with acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint separations were retrospectively analyzed. Cases were divided into coracoid single-tunnel fixation (n = 21) and tunnel-less suspension fixation (n = 24) groups. Open surgical techniques were used in both groups. Operative time, incision length, blood loss, Constant-Murley scores, pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and coracoclavicular (CC) distance were compared at preoperative, immediate postoperative (for CC distance), 3-month, and final follow-up (mean 9.1 months). Complications were evaluated. The tunnel-less group had shorter operative times (46.76 ± 5.01 vs 64.70 ± 5.72 minutes, P < .001) but similar blood loss and incision lengths (P > .05). Preoperative CC distances were similar. Postoperatively, both groups achieved significant reduction (single-tunnel: 9.7 ± 1.1 mm; tunnel-less: 9.4 ± 0.9 mm, P = .287). At final follow-up, CC distances were 11.6 ± 2.5 mm and 10.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively (P = .068). At 3 months, Constant-Murley scores were higher in the tunnel-less group (85.80 ± 2.22 vs 84.70 ± 1.75, P = .008), though differences in visual analog scale and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons were nonsignificant. No clinically significant differences in functional scores were observed at final follow-up. One coracoid fracture and 1 re-dislocation occurred in the single-tunnel group; no intraoperative or major postoperative complications occurred in the tunnel-less group. Both techniques achieved reliable fixation and functional recovery. Tunnel-less fixation required shorter operative time, avoided coracoid tunneling, and demonstrated a superior safety profile by reducing iatrogenic fracture risk and showing a trend towards better maintenance of radiographic reduction.

MedicineVol. 104(37)
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering (China) (CN), Wuhan Sixth Hospital (CN), S.P.E.C.I.E.S. (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.