Comparison of expandable and titanium cages in anterior cervical corpectomy for OPLL with osteoporosis: A retrospective matched study

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is commonly used to treat cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). In patients with concurrent osteoporosis, titanium cage fusion (TCF) may lead to increased implant subsidence and poorer early outcomes. Novel expandable artificial vertebral body fusion (NEAVBF) systems have been developed to address these challenges by offering improved intraoperative adjustability and biomechanical support. To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of NEAVBF and TCF in osteoporotic patients with cervical OPLL undergoing single-level ACCF. Retrospective cohort study with 1:1 propensity score matching. Eighty-two patients with cervical OPLL and osteoporosis (41 in each group) who underwent single-level ACCF and completed at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic outcomes included C2 to C7 Cobb angle, implant subsidence, and fusion rate. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and JOA recovery rate at preoperative, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were compared between groups at preoperative, 6-month, and 2-year time points. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and neurological function. At 6 months, NEAVBF resulted in lower Visual Analogue Scale (P < .001), higher JOA scores (P = .013), and greater recovery rate (P < .001), while Neck Disability Index scores were similar (P = .065). Cervical lordosis improved more in the NEAVBF group at 6 months (P = .038) and 2 years (P = .004). Implant subsidence was less common in the NEAVBF group at 6 months (12.2% vs 31.7%, P = .060) and 2 years (26.8% vs 53.7%, P = .024). Although 6-month fusion rates were higher in the NEAVBF group (70.7% vs 51.2%, P = .112), both groups reached similar fusion at 2 years (97.6% vs 92.7%, P = .616). Both NEAVBF and TCF provided favorable long-term outcomes. However, NEAVBF demonstrated superior early cervical alignment, neurological recovery, and reduced implant subsidence, supporting its value in osteoporotic patients with cervical OPLL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000044227
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of expandable and titanium cages in anterior cervical corpectomy for OPLL with osteoporosis: A retrospective matched study

Zhancheng Liang, Yaqi Li, Kun Yang, Hanhui Liu et al.
Medicine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Comparison of expandable and titanium cages in anterior cervical corpectomy for OPLL with osteoporosis: A retrospective matched study

Zhancheng Liang, Yaqi Li, Kun Yang, Hanhui Liu, Jianhong Liang
article en

Abstract

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is commonly used to treat cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). In patients with concurrent osteoporosis, titanium cage fusion (TCF) may lead to increased implant subsidence and poorer early outcomes. Novel expandable artificial vertebral body fusion (NEAVBF) systems have been developed to address these challenges by offering improved intraoperative adjustability and biomechanical support. To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of NEAVBF and TCF in osteoporotic patients with cervical OPLL undergoing single-level ACCF. Retrospective cohort study with 1:1 propensity score matching. Eighty-two patients with cervical OPLL and osteoporosis (41 in each group) who underwent single-level ACCF and completed at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic outcomes included C2 to C7 Cobb angle, implant subsidence, and fusion rate. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and JOA recovery rate at preoperative, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were compared between groups at preoperative, 6-month, and 2-year time points. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and neurological function. At 6 months, NEAVBF resulted in lower Visual Analogue Scale (P < .001), higher JOA scores (P = .013), and greater recovery rate (P < .001), while Neck Disability Index scores were similar (P = .065). Cervical lordosis improved more in the NEAVBF group at 6 months (P = .038) and 2 years (P = .004). Implant subsidence was less common in the NEAVBF group at 6 months (12.2% vs 31.7%, P = .060) and 2 years (26.8% vs 53.7%, P = .024). Although 6-month fusion rates were higher in the NEAVBF group (70.7% vs 51.2%, P = .112), both groups reached similar fusion at 2 years (97.6% vs 92.7%, P = .616). Both NEAVBF and TCF provided favorable long-term outcomes. However, NEAVBF demonstrated superior early cervical alignment, neurological recovery, and reduced implant subsidence, supporting its value in osteoporotic patients with cervical OPLL.

MedicineVol. 104(37)
Foshan Hospital of TCM (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.