COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES (AI) FOR AVAILABLE TRANSFER CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT IN POWER SYSTEMS

The accurate assessment of Available Transfer Capability (ATC) is critical for ensuring reliable and efficient operation of modern power systems. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of ATC, the five distinct methodologies are analyzed: Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF), AC Power Flow analysis, Dynamic Analysis incorporating time-domain simulations, Continuation Power Flow (CPF) for voltage stability assessment, and AI technique VARMAX statistical modeling for forecasting applications. Through extensive literature review and comparative analysis, this study evaluates the accuracy, computational complexity, and practical applications of each method. The paper includes detailed mathematical formulations, block diagrams, performance comparisons, and implementation guidelines. Results demonstrate that while PTDF methods offer computational efficiency for real-time applications, AC power flow provides superior accuracy for detailed analysis. Dynamic methods are essential for transient stability constraints, CPF excels in voltage stability studies, and VARMAX offers unique capabilities for statistical forecasting of transfer capabilities. The comprehensive analysis includes over 30 references from leading researchers in the field, providing a complete overview of current state-of-the-art methodologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52152/g480h086
Primary Topic
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES (AI) FOR AVAILABLE TRANSFER CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT IN POWER SYSTEMS

Sujata N. Kale, Nitin D. Ghawghawe
Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF METHODOLOGIES (AI) FOR AVAILABLE TRANSFER CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT IN POWER SYSTEMS

Sujata N. Kale, Nitin D. Ghawghawe
article en

Abstract

The accurate assessment of Available Transfer Capability (ATC) is critical for ensuring reliable and efficient operation of modern power systems. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of ATC, the five distinct methodologies are analyzed: Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF), AC Power Flow analysis, Dynamic Analysis incorporating time-domain simulations, Continuation Power Flow (CPF) for voltage stability assessment, and AI technique VARMAX statistical modeling for forecasting applications. Through extensive literature review and comparative analysis, this study evaluates the accuracy, computational complexity, and practical applications of each method. The paper includes detailed mathematical formulations, block diagrams, performance comparisons, and implementation guidelines. Results demonstrate that while PTDF methods offer computational efficiency for real-time applications, AC power flow provides superior accuracy for detailed analysis. Dynamic methods are essential for transient stability constraints, CPF excels in voltage stability studies, and VARMAX offers unique capabilities for statistical forecasting of transfer capabilities. The comprehensive analysis includes over 30 references from leading researchers in the field, providing a complete overview of current state-of-the-art methodologies.

Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.