A Competitive Edge: How Social Cues and Spatial Congruence Influence Joint Attention in addressed or witnessed interactions

Joint attention is crucial for the development of social cognition, but whether the type ofrelationship (i.e., cooperative or competitive) or interaction (e.g., addressed or witnessed)modulates joint attention is unclear. This study investigated these factors in 96 neurotypicaladults using a video object-choice task. Here, participants chose between cups based on anactor's pointing cue, either while being addressed or witnessing an interaction between twoactors. Participants were primed about the actor's cooperative or competitive intent.Experiment 1 found no significant interaction between these factors. However, Experiment 2,considering spatial attention (cue direction), revealed nuanced effects. In addressedinteractions, more social cues led to faster responses, especially during spatially congruentcooperative trials. In witnessed interactions, responses were faster to spatially incongruentcues in cooperative trials and vice versa in competitive trials. These findings suggest thatjoint attention is not solely a passive response to social cues, but is actively shaped by thesocial context and spatial configuration, highlighting how individuals actively interpret andadapt to others attentional cues.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2q456_v1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Competitive Edge: How Social Cues and Spatial Congruence Influence Joint Attention in addressed or witnessed interactions

A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, Andrew Surtees, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Isabel Blackie
1 citations
Action Observation and Synchronization
2.44
article

A Competitive Edge: How Social Cues and Spatial Congruence Influence Joint Attention in addressed or witnessed interactions

A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, Andrew Surtees, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Isabel Blackie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Joint attention is crucial for the development of social cognition, but whether the type ofrelationship (i.e., cooperative or competitive) or interaction (e.g., addressed or witnessed)modulates joint attention is unclear. This study investigated these factors in 96 neurotypicaladults using a video object-choice task. Here, participants chose between cups based on anactor's pointing cue, either while being addressed or witnessing an interaction between twoactors. Participants were primed about the actor's cooperative or competitive intent.Experiment 1 found no significant interaction between these factors. However, Experiment 2,considering spatial attention (cue direction), revealed nuanced effects. In addressedinteractions, more social cues led to faster responses, especially during spatially congruentcooperative trials. In witnessed interactions, responses were faster to spatially incongruentcues in cooperative trials and vice versa in competitive trials. These findings suggest thatjoint attention is not solely a passive response to social cues, but is actively shaped by thesocial context and spatial configuration, highlighting how individuals actively interpret andadapt to others attentional cues.

Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Action Observation and Synchronization
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Competitive Edge: How Social Cues and Spatial Congruence Influence Joint Attention in addressed or witnessed interactions — A.Y.M. Atiquil Islam, Andrew Surtees, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS