The Place of Forced Labor in the Alternative Punishment System

With the introduction of criminal penalties not related to isolation from society, the scientific literature increasingly began to use the phraseology "alternative punishments", which has become common today. However, it was only with the beginning of the use of punishment in the form of forced labor in 2017 that the phrase "alternative punishment" became legally fixed and thus began to correspond to the essence of the punishment itself. According to the position of the authors stated in this article, the term "alternative punishments", and even more so their "system", is used incorrectly. Forming a subsystem, punishments that are not related to isolation from society (not including forced labor) can act as alternatives only to each other. Actually, it is in this capacity that they are considered in judicial practice. The difficulties faced by judicial and law enforcement practice in the first 6 years since the beginning of the use of forced labor were due not so much to the novelty of the punishment itself (similar measures were used in the Soviet period as probation and conditional release with mandatory labor), but rather to the organizational and legal shortcomings inherent in this punishment. As a result, forced labor still cannot fully meet the purpose assigned to it by the legislator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/118/57
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Place of Forced Labor in the Alternative Punishment System

V. Geranin, S. Maltseva
Bulletin of Science and Practice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

The Place of Forced Labor in the Alternative Punishment System

V. Geranin, S. Maltseva
article en

Abstract

With the introduction of criminal penalties not related to isolation from society, the scientific literature increasingly began to use the phraseology "alternative punishments", which has become common today. However, it was only with the beginning of the use of punishment in the form of forced labor in 2017 that the phrase "alternative punishment" became legally fixed and thus began to correspond to the essence of the punishment itself. According to the position of the authors stated in this article, the term "alternative punishments", and even more so their "system", is used incorrectly. Forming a subsystem, punishments that are not related to isolation from society (not including forced labor) can act as alternatives only to each other. Actually, it is in this capacity that they are considered in judicial practice. The difficulties faced by judicial and law enforcement practice in the first 6 years since the beginning of the use of forced labor were due not so much to the novelty of the punishment itself (similar measures were used in the Soviet period as probation and conditional release with mandatory labor), but rather to the organizational and legal shortcomings inherent in this punishment. As a result, forced labor still cannot fully meet the purpose assigned to it by the legislator.

Bulletin of Science and PracticeVol. 11(9)
Moscow Witte University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.