Train Live Load Effects on the Subsidence of the Backfill Behind the Sheet Retaining Wall

Live loads generated by trains are a significant load in lateral pressure and settlement calculations. Studies emphasize the meaning of “accurately calculating live loads” to ensure the initial straightness of retaining walls. So, overestimating the effect of live loads generated by trains will lead to an overdesign of retaining walls and the surrounding soil and increase the cost of shoring. However, calculating these loads accurately will result in sufficient reinforcement without the need for excessive design of the retaining walls, leading to a durable design of the train system at a lower cost. In the present work, a laboratory model of a 1/7 scaled railway track was manufactured and employed. The influence of the live load induced by the trains passing on the cumulative settlement of backfill soil behind the sheet retaining walls was studied. Many parameters were studied, consisting of different burden amplitudes (0.22, 0.44, and 0.66 tons), vibration frequencies (2, 4, and 6 Hz), relative density (30% loose, 55% medium, and 75% dense sand), and different distances between the railway and retaining wall (0.5H, 1H, and 1.5H). The results showed that under the same cyclic burden amplitude, increases in the backfill relative density significantly impacted the dynamic settlement of the railway. The cumulative dynamic settlement ratio decreased as the horizontal distance between the railway and the retaining wall increased. The cumulative dynamic settlement ratio decreased by about 27.8% and 18.3%, as the railway location relative to the retaining wall changed from 0.5H to 1H and 1H to 1.5H, respectively. Dynamic settlement decreased as frequency increased when the conditions were kept constant. The settlement ratio increased with the live loading amplitude. Finally, dense backfill soil acted more efficiently than the medium soil, reducing the railway settlement and improving the overall behavior of the railway track adjacent to retaining walls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.32.3.38
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Train Live Load Effects on the Subsidence of the Backfill Behind the Sheet Retaining Wall

Mahmood R. Mahmood, Kather A. Naji, Mohammed A. Al-Neami
Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Train Live Load Effects on the Subsidence of the Backfill Behind the Sheet Retaining Wall

Mahmood R. Mahmood, Kather A. Naji, Mohammed A. Al-Neami
article en

Abstract

Live loads generated by trains are a significant load in lateral pressure and settlement calculations. Studies emphasize the meaning of “accurately calculating live loads” to ensure the initial straightness of retaining walls. So, overestimating the effect of live loads generated by trains will lead to an overdesign of retaining walls and the surrounding soil and increase the cost of shoring. However, calculating these loads accurately will result in sufficient reinforcement without the need for excessive design of the retaining walls, leading to a durable design of the train system at a lower cost. In the present work, a laboratory model of a 1/7 scaled railway track was manufactured and employed. The influence of the live load induced by the trains passing on the cumulative settlement of backfill soil behind the sheet retaining walls was studied. Many parameters were studied, consisting of different burden amplitudes (0.22, 0.44, and 0.66 tons), vibration frequencies (2, 4, and 6 Hz), relative density (30% loose, 55% medium, and 75% dense sand), and different distances between the railway and retaining wall (0.5H, 1H, and 1.5H). The results showed that under the same cyclic burden amplitude, increases in the backfill relative density significantly impacted the dynamic settlement of the railway. The cumulative dynamic settlement ratio decreased as the horizontal distance between the railway and the retaining wall increased. The cumulative dynamic settlement ratio decreased by about 27.8% and 18.3%, as the railway location relative to the retaining wall changed from 0.5H to 1H and 1H to 1.5H, respectively. Dynamic settlement decreased as frequency increased when the conditions were kept constant. The settlement ratio increased with the live loading amplitude. Finally, dense backfill soil acted more efficiently than the medium soil, reducing the railway settlement and improving the overall behavior of the railway track adjacent to retaining walls.

Tikrit Journal of Engineering SciencesVol. 32(3)
University of Technology - Iraq (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.