The Member States’ Right to Be Heard by the Union Administration

The right to be heard, a general principle and fundamental right in Union law, requires the administration to hear the persons negatively affected by a decision before taking it. The right must be observed even in the absence of ordinary legislation that provides for hearings in a given administrative procedure. One hitherto unexplored aspect of the right is that its holders are not only individuals, but also Member States, when subject to Union administrative power. This article maps some of the instances where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recognized the right of Member States to be heard. The article further highlights that the ambiguous role of the Member States in European administrative law raises doubts as to when, and to what extent, they should be treated, not as subordinate co-enforcers of Union law under the coordination of the Union administration, but as subjects of the Union administration, with interests of their own that warrant procedural protection before an adverse decision is taken. Ultimately, CJEU case law fails to provide a clear test to establish when the right to be heard of Member States applies. This, the paper argues, risks undermining constitutional requirements of national self-determination, autonomy of Union law, and the balance of power between the Union and the Member States.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Public Law
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2025024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Member States’ Right to Be Heard by the Union Administration

Filipe Brito Bastos
1 citations
European Public Law
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
8.52
article

The Member States’ Right to Be Heard by the Union Administration

Filipe Brito Bastos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The right to be heard, a general principle and fundamental right in Union law, requires the administration to hear the persons negatively affected by a decision before taking it. The right must be observed even in the absence of ordinary legislation that provides for hearings in a given administrative procedure. One hitherto unexplored aspect of the right is that its holders are not only individuals, but also Member States, when subject to Union administrative power. This article maps some of the instances where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recognized the right of Member States to be heard. The article further highlights that the ambiguous role of the Member States in European administrative law raises doubts as to when, and to what extent, they should be treated, not as subordinate co-enforcers of Union law under the coordination of the Union administration, but as subjects of the Union administration, with interests of their own that warrant procedural protection before an adverse decision is taken. Ultimately, CJEU case law fails to provide a clear test to establish when the right to be heard of Member States applies. This, the paper argues, risks undermining constitutional requirements of national self-determination, autonomy of Union law, and the balance of power between the Union and the Member States.

European Public LawVol. 31(Issue 2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Member States’ Right to Be Heard by the Union Administration — Filipe Brito Bastos · European Public Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS