Can education drive literacy and socially-important behaviour? Evidence from a financial literacy experiment
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the role of education for literacy and socially-important behaviour using a financial investment context. Design/methodology/approach A survey-based experiment involving 1,202 Australian adults compared four educational formats – text, imagery, audio and video – on their ability to improve financial literacy and influence investment choices. Participants completed a pre- and post-quiz, a behaviourally relevant investment task and attitudinal evaluations. Findings The four educational formats all improved financial literacy, with video-based education producing the most substantial gains. However, effectiveness depended on risk tolerance: video was most effective for risk-averse individuals but less so for risk-takers. Educational format had limited influence on investment behaviour, with demographic factors such as age, literacy level and risk profile playing a greater role. Practical implications Financial institutions should prioritise video-based education while integrating interactive, real-time learning tools to support financial decision-making, recognising that financial education in isolation does not alter investment behaviours. Originality/value This study contributes to the debate on financial education’s impact, demonstrating format-dependent learning effects while emphasising that education alone is insufficient to drive financial behaviour change. The findings support the case for just-in-time financial education, where learning is embedded within real-world financial decisions.
Authors
- Merle Marie Luise Henrica van den Akker
Institutions
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Social Impact in Business Research
- Published
- 2025-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jsibr-11-2024-0057
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.91