Analysis of race officials’ mistakes in sailing competitions

The article presents the results of systematic pedagogical observations of race officials’ activities during 23 sailing competitions (2021–2024). The study focuses on analyzing judging mistakes, decision-making patterns, and communication dynamics within officiating teams. Based on a developed observation protocol, 253 mistakes were recorded, with the majority being technical failures (54 %), human-factor mistakes (42 %), and rare but most complex rule interpretation mistakes (4 %). The research found that competition duration correlates with mistakes frequency: in 6-day events, the number of mistakes reaches 13–15, with fatigue-related mistakes increasing toward the final days. Time spent resolving mistakes varies from seconds (technical issues) to 24 hours (controversial situations). The study proposes recommendations to optimize officiating: enhanced technical oversight, standardized protocols for disputed cases, adjusted work schedules, and specialized judge training. The findings can improve the quality of judging in sailing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues of Sports Psychology and Pedagogy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15826/spp.2025.3.148
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of race officials’ mistakes in sailing competitions

V. V. Georgiadi
Current Issues of Sports Psychology and Pedagogy
Sports Performance and Training
article

Analysis of race officials’ mistakes in sailing competitions

V. V. Georgiadi
article en

Abstract

The article presents the results of systematic pedagogical observations of race officials’ activities during 23 sailing competitions (2021–2024). The study focuses on analyzing judging mistakes, decision-making patterns, and communication dynamics within officiating teams. Based on a developed observation protocol, 253 mistakes were recorded, with the majority being technical failures (54 %), human-factor mistakes (42 %), and rare but most complex rule interpretation mistakes (4 %). The research found that competition duration correlates with mistakes frequency: in 6-day events, the number of mistakes reaches 13–15, with fatigue-related mistakes increasing toward the final days. Time spent resolving mistakes varies from seconds (technical issues) to 24 hours (controversial situations). The study proposes recommendations to optimize officiating: enhanced technical oversight, standardized protocols for disputed cases, adjusted work schedules, and specialized judge training. The findings can improve the quality of judging in sailing.

Current Issues of Sports Psychology and PedagogyVol. 5(3)
Federal Scientific Center of Physical Culture and Sports (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of race officials’ mistakes in sailing competitions — V. V. Georgiadi · Current Issues of Sports Psychology and Pedagogy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS